Re: big table not displayed properly

2004-01-21 Thread Chris Hawks
The attached Train.pdb workes fine on my Palm and all the hardware I can emulate. (Except for the missing last row I just fixed in CVS). Anyone else see the problem?? I can't test on anything newer than PalmOS 4. Ardiyanto, what model is your Palm? And the exact version number from App->Info->Ver

Re: big table not displayed properly (more bug)

2004-01-21 Thread Chris Hawks
---Reply to mail from Ardiyanto about big table not displayed properly (more bug) > And to add my previous bug report, > > please notice that the last line of the table is not displayed on the "plucker > viewer", altough it is displayed on the web browser (at desktop) This one was easy to fi

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Alexander Pruss
Plucker currently can't handle a continuous paragraph break-- a paragraph break always forces at least a line break. Alex - Original Message - From: Michael Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:07 pm Subject: Re: proposal: exact anchors > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Alexander Pruss
> You still haven't convinced me that the Plucker format should be > changed. You *can* handle this using the current format You mean by breaking up text mid-paragraph, and occasionally mid-sentence, via a filter that searches for tags? Note that this is probably quite impossible with somethin

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: > But the basic thing is this. is supposed to let one go > straight to the tag. Currently, it doesn't--it goes back > to the top of the paragraph containing that tag, You still haven't convinced me that the Plucker format should be changed. You *

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004, Keith M. Hughes wrote: > The parser shouldn't create a new paragraph every time it has seen an "a > name" tag. That tag is not a paragraph creating tag like or . You make the mistake of assuming that an HTML paragraph is the same thing as a paragraph in Plucker... /Mike _

Hi

2004-01-21 Thread rob
Test =) sybbhqmuuwgvcps -- Test, yep. <>

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
> > This just doesn't seem to be the right way of handling HTML named > > anchors, even if it works for most documents because of the accident > > that in most HTML documents (I assume) the named anchors are at the > > beginning of a text. > > Lots of HTML is written poorly. We can't do much to hel

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Dave Maddock
> BTW, if you start supporting this for arbitrary places, you should also > support the id attribute, which allows any element to be used as a > destination for a > link. Or does Plucker already do this? The JPluck parser purports to (I haven't knowingly tried it). Don't think the python parser

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread David A. Desrosiers
> BTW, if you start supporting this for arbitrary places, you should also > support the id attribute, which allows any element to be used as a > destination for a link. Or does Plucker already do this? Let's also not forget that the 'name' attribute has been dropped in XHTML 1.1 (and fut

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Keith M. Hughes
I don't understand why this should be necessary; you can already go to the "exact" position (if the parser creates a new paragraph when it encounters an "a name" tag in the text). The parser shouldn't create a new paragraph every time it has seen an "a name" tag. That tag is not a paragraph crea

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread Keith M. Hughes
But the basic thing is this. is supposed to let one go straight to the tag. Currently, it doesn't--it goes back to the top of the paragraph containing that tag, and it is quite possible that the place with the tag doesn't even show up on that screen. BTW, if you start supporting this for ar

Re: proposal: exact anchors

2004-01-21 Thread David A. Desrosiers
> But the basic thing is this. is supposed to let one go > straight to the tag. Currently, it doesn't--it goes > back to the top of the paragraph containing that tag, and it is quite > possible that the place with the tag doesn't even show up on that > screen. It works like this in de

Re: cvs checkout/configure problem

2004-01-21 Thread David A. Desrosiers
> so - something wrong with the autogen or configure scripts? Did you run autoreconf in the viewer subdirectory? d. ___ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev