I'm sorry, Richard, but I can't pass up pointing out inconsistent
philosophy. the GNU GPL is exactly Digital Restrictions Management.
They are not the same, they are not even the same kind of thing. The
GNU GPL is a copyright-based license. Digital Restrictions Management
is a feature
Would you disapprove of software which enforced, in some way, the GNU GPL?
The idea is inconceivable, since the point of the GPL is that you CAN
edit the source. But if this were possible, it would not be wrong.
Digital Restrictions Management is wrong because it tries to deny the
public
