the web site and the man pages are
> in a "correct" format from the very beginning.
Cool! (wiping egg off face ;^)
--re: Re: HTML manual tarball (was: Bad manuals)
Chris
#include
#include
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher R. Hawks Software Engineer
Syscon Plantstar a Division of Syscon International
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001, Chris Hawks wrote:
> Actually, I meant that we should have a tarball available (on the
> website) that contains only the HTML manual, man pages, and FAQ. So
> interested parties and people like me who aren't set up to build the
> manual could get the docs.
And I meant th
who aren't set up to build the
manual could get the docs.
--re: HTML manual tarball (was: Bad manuals)
Chris
#include
#include
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher R. Hawks Software Engineer
Syscon Plantstar a Division of Syscon International
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001, Chris Hawks wrote:
>
> Maybe this would be a good time to lobby for a 'manual - only' tarball.
OK, I have added that to the Makefile. It will only include the HTML
manual; if you want the Plucker document or the man pages for the
tools then you have to download the binary
o use latex2html instead of tex4ht (ht latex).
I don't have TeX or the other packages installed so
I take the "coward's" way out. I download the 'bin' tarball and install
only the manual. (I build the rest directly from the source.)
Maybe this would be a good time t
Hi!
> > Alexander, can you comment?
>
> Alexander has emailed me off-list to say that it was because tex4ht
> doesn't exist for OS/2 at the time it was written. He also gave me
> lots of other useful comments. Can someone tell me what tex4ht
> availability is like on other platforms now
"David A. Desrosiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander, can you comment?
Alexander has emailed me off-list to say that it was because tex4ht
doesn't exist for OS/2 at the time it was written. He also gave me
lots of other useful comments. Can someone tell me what tex4ht
availabili
> I suggest that the manuals are moved to use tex4ht and hopefully remain
> compatible with building with latex2html. If no-one is able, I will make
> a start, but it may be some time. But first I wanted to ask, is there a
> strong reason why latex2html is used?
I believe this was done
After prompting on the newsgroups, I've noticed that I can't build the
plucker manuals. This is because they are in latex but use some
packages that aren't in tetex, most notably html, but also because
they want to use latex2html instead of tex4ht (ht latex).
Briefly, tetex is the largest standa
