> > Why would there be a CRLF in html if there's a / tag instead?
>
> For human readability. But I had assumed, I guess wrongly, that all such
> things get stripped out by the distiller.
Or because you're in a region.
Bill
___
plucker-dev mailing l
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> > I am also a bit puzzled as to why the special handling for
> > two-byte characters? (Why not three- or four-byte ones?)
>
> Because that's what Matto implemented... If you want to see something
> el
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> I am also a bit puzzled as to why the special handling for
> two-byte characters? (Why not three- or four-byte ones?)
Because that's what Matto implemented... If you want to see something
else then you know the drill ;-)
/Mike
__
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:44:59AM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> That still leaves one question. Does the OS encode CRLF into a WChar as
> 0x0D0A or as 0x0A0D? (These endian things are confusing.) Or as
> something else?
I would highly doubt that. I would suspect that a CRLF would be
repre
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> > 1. This looks to me like it's checking for all two-byte length characters,
> > not just CRLF. This surely isn't correct behavior, because it will allow
> > line-breaking at any two-byte length charac
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> 1. This looks to me like it's checking for all two-byte length characters,
> not just CRLF. This surely isn't correct behavior, because it will allow
> line-breaking at any two-byte length character.
Well, I think you are making a mistake in your
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote:
> > 2. Thus, how do we check that the character is indeed CRLF? What is the
> > two-byte encoding of CRLF?
>
> In this other program which I'm working on, here is what I do (not
> saying it anymore right, but one possibility)
>
> static const Char CRLF[]
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote:
> > 3. And why should there be a CRLF in the record given that we have
> > function 0x38 instead?
>
> Why would there be a CRLF in html if there's a / tag instead?
For human readability. But I had assumed, I guess wrongly, that all such
things get stripp
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> 1. This looks to me like it's checking for all two-byte length characters,
> not just CRLF. This surely isn't correct behavior, because it will allow
> line-breaking at any two-byte length character.
I think you're right...
>
Here's a puzzle about paragraph.c/GetLineMetrics(). The puzzling code
reads:
/* CRLF can be inserted anywhere if it is multibyte char */
if ( TxtGlueCharSize( nextToken ) == 2 ) {
lastSpacePixels = linePixels;
lastSpace = tokenCount;
10 matches
Mail list logo