From: "Adam McDaniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> > But if there are complaints about the sign flip, I shan't do it.
>
> Well, my only concern is that it keeps the context of the *Offset
> values with each other. However it might be r
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> But if there are complaints about the sign flip, I shan't do it.
Well, my only concern is that it keeps the context of the *Offset
values with each other. However it might be redundant for a reason
that's beyond me. I havn't rea
Yeah, I suspected as much. I am very strongly tempted, now that I am
removing verticalOffset entirely from the metarecords (there is no need
for it there, as it is always duplicated in the current history record)
while adding in a character-based offset, to flip the sign. It's weird
hav
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:34:31PM -0600, Adam McDaniel wrote:
>~||~ <-- MaxExtentX()
> ||
> Bot of page ||
Oops, that was supposed to be MaxExtentY(). You get the idea :)
--
Adam McDaniel
Array.org
Calgary, AB, Canada
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:27:15AM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> Is there any good reason why verticalOffset is always negative?
Its becuase its the relation of the top of the page to the top of the
device's screen. Ie,
Top of page || <-- veritcalOffset
_||_
Is there any good reason why verticalOffset is always negative?
Alex
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss
Department of Philosophy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online papers and home page: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
