On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Linux Cook linuxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've setup a centos-5.2 server (eth1 facing the internet) with a simple port
forwarding where it forwards port 8081 to my internal box' (192.168.0.2)
port 8080.
$ lsmod |grep iptable
iptable_mangle
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:31 AM, jan gestre plugger.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Both eth0 and eth1 belong to the same network that is why the latter is
happening, if what you want is to route traffic to other subnets (Is this
what you're trying to do?), I suggest you configure the either eth0 or
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle
johannta...@gmail.com wrote:
This is so cool. If this is the case I can make my own handheld software
that will interface with whatever I choose as desktop application, in case a
handheld version is not available. When do you think we
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Miguel Paraz mpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle
johannta...@gmail.com wrote:
This is so cool. If this is the case I can make my own handheld software
that will interface with whatever I choose as desktop
Hi edel...
Yep it's weird...
I'm accessing the forwarded port from remote network. Should I disable
SELINUX on the internal box too just like what I did with the gateway box?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Edel SM sier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Linux Cook
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve here, when you bond/team two
NICS the most probable outcome I can think of is failover, if failover is
what you want I suggest you read this http://www.howtoforge.com/nic_bonding or
you can use BSD's ucarp.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ozzie de
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Miguel Paraz mpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle
johannta...@gmail.com wrote:
This is so cool. If this is the case I can make my own handheld software
that will interface with whatever I choose as desktop
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:45 AM, jan gestre plugger.l...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve here, when you bond/team two
NICS the most probable outcome I can think of is failover, if failover is
what you want I suggest you read this
hello,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ozzie de Leon ozne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:45 AM, jan gestre plugger.l...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm just trying to figure out why am i able to access both DHCP and static
IP addresses when only eth0 has a cable connected to it (eth1
helo cook,
anong luto natin ngayon?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Linux Cook linuxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi edel...
Yep it's weird...
anywya, hhehe hindi ko pa alam talaga kung ano prob ng port forawrding
mo. di ba tumatagos galing sa labas?
I'm accessing the forwarded port from remote
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ozzie de Leon ozne...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry about that. thing is, i don't want them bonded, which is why my
/sbin/ifconfig doesn't show any bond0 interface.
i'm just trying to figure out why am i able to access both DHCP and static
IP addresses when only eth0
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ozzie,
this is something to do with the arp protocol... do the following at
the root user account..
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_ignore=1
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_ignore=1
one more thing.. before
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Miguel Paraz mpa...@gmail.com wrote:
And as for bad UI... I'm coming from the opposite end, Nokia and
BlackBerry, not iPhone. I can't touch type this phone.
migz,
we have an upcoming touchscreen phone that will compete to iPhone
which is N97
13 matches
Mail list logo
