Re: [plug] Bonded ethernet ports

2009-01-27 Thread jan gestre
I've already answered your question in previous reply, they belong to the same subnet that is why. On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ozzie de Leon ozne...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:45 AM, jan gestre plugger.l...@gmail.comwrote: It's not clear what you're trying to achieve

Re: [plug] Is there a way to find out who steak or break my lock in SVN?

2009-01-27 Thread jan gestre
$ cd /path/to/svn ; svn info will list the latest info i.e., version, person who last edited...$ svn --help for other options available. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jay Jesus Amorin jay.amo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Pluggers, I have lock a file on the repository and the someone steal or

Re: [plug] port forwarding not functioning

2009-01-27 Thread fooler mail
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Linux Cook linuxc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I've setup a centos-5.2 server (eth1 facing the internet) with a simple port forwarding where it forwards port 8081 to my internal box' (192.168.0.2) port 8080. $IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m

Re: [plug] port forwarding not functioning

2009-01-27 Thread fooler mail
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:11 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: [remote client] source 1.1.1.1: destination 2.2.2.2:8081 [nat box] source 192.168.0.1: destination 192.168.0.2:8080 [web server] source 192.168.0.2:8080 destination 192.168.0.1: [nat box] source 2.2.2.2:8081

Re: [plug] port forwarding not functioning

2009-01-27 Thread Edel SM
hello, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:28 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:11 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: [remote client] source 1.1.1.1: destination 2.2.2.2:8081 [nat box] source 192.168.0.1: destination 192.168.0.2:8080 [web server]

Re: [plug] Bonded ethernet ports

2009-01-27 Thread Edel SM
helo On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:13 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: hi ozzie, this is something to do with the arp protocol... do the following at the root user account.. # sysctl -w

Re: [plug] Bonded ethernet ports

2009-01-27 Thread fooler mail
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Edel SM sier...@gmail.com wrote: helo On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:13 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM, fooler mail fooler.m...@gmail.com wrote: hi ozzie, this is something to do with the arp protocol... do the

Re: [plug] Bonded ethernet ports

2009-01-27 Thread andrelst
Ozzie, Jan is correct here... The OS and switch will be confused with this. A simple solution without bonding is just: * Configure eth0 as dhcp client. In your example, 172.16.17.15 is the dynamic ip address. * create a virtual ip on eth0. In your example, it should be 172.16.17.95 as the