Just a quick note - there is practically no learning curve to screen.
You can start it with just 'screen' then run whatever commands you want,
and then you can disconnect it with Ctrl-a d. (Ctrl-a pushed together, then
release both, then press d by itself.) Then 'screen -r' will reconnect to
it
I had I think it was linkdin got idiot for a bit this morning but it came
back. I am
doing job hunting, and was seeing those weird screens there for a while. It
is
bad enough dealing with Hughesnet that can not seem to get links to some
sites that I am trying to reach, I have a wait a bit and THEN
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:33:57PM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Is there a tool which can be
> "turned on" at time t0
> "turned off" at time t1
> which will report the number of
> "uploaded" bytes
> "downloaded" bytes
> in that interval?
For your purposes, perhaps you pipe a standard
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Tom wrote:
> To see if your background process does something with the CPU rather than
> just hang around waiting for user input for example - you could see the
> process CPU load and wall clock time - the time should be increasing. The
> easiest way is to fire: top and see
To see if your background process does something with the CPU rather
than just hang around waiting for user input for example - you could
see the process CPU load and wall clock time - the time should be
increasing.
The easiest way is to fire: top and see what CPU percentage the process
uses and
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:03:51 -0800
Bill Barry dijo:
>> Still can't get the desktop to see the internet. :(
>You could at least temporarily set the network up on the desktop to
>use DHCP and see if that fixes the problems. If you later want to
>switch it back to static ip
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Chuck Hast wrote:
> I saw that also, did the usual close down, no joy, reboot, no joy, then I
> tested from another machine and got the same thing so figured it was "out
> yonder somewhere". I still have a couple that come up like that but most
> of them are back to normal.
I saw that also, did the usual close down, no joy, reboot, no joy, then I
tested
from another machine and got the same thing so figured it was "out yonder
somewhere". I still have a couple that come up like that but most of them
are
back to normal. This was on both FF and Chrome. Looks like WU is
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Think I'll manually clear the cache and see if that makes a difference.
Sigh. No joy.
Other ideas welcome.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Larry Brigman wrote:
> I saw a report on the AWS S3 outage. Lots of companies place their static
> files in S3 storage. This is probably what hit you and a bunch of other
> sites.
Larry,
I saw that report, too. That was on Tuesday, the last day sites displayed
correctly
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Larry Brigman wrote:
> If you started it with nohup; it will stay running until it exits on its
> own or is killed. The output of jobs (based on my reading) is local to the
> running shell. So each window/shell could result in different output. If
> the shell closes, the jobs
If you started it with nohup; it will stay running until it exits on its
own or is killed. The output of jobs (based on my reading) is local to the
running shell. So each window/shell could result in different output. If
the shell closes, the jobs list is removed. Current running jobs would
Starting yesterday morning firefox-45.7.0 did not display images on
certain web pages, for example, the radar on wunderground.com and all images
on oregonlive.com. When I try to load those pages using
chromium-54.0.2840.100 they won't load at all. Other web sites also have
issues: linkedin.com
Knowing that a model would run for a long time I started it last Sunday at
8:10 am in the background by appending '&' to the command line. Since then I
sporadically look at the status of that process ID and see the status as S,
which I understand is interruptible sleep.
When I check status
On 03/01/2017 07:23 PM, King Beowulf wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 02:33 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> *NOTE BENE*
>> Capitalization in subject line semantically important :>
>>
>> I have significant bandwidth constraints.
>> I have been asked to participate in a project requiring significant data
>>
On 03/01/2017 05:32 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 04:44 PM, Robert Citek wrote:
>> Would /proc/net/dev give you the info you are looking for?
>
> I don't know.
> Will investigate when awake.
> Thank you.
A good night's sleep and a cup of coffee (even if decaf) yields a
*POSITIVE*
Portland Linux/Unix Group General Meeting Announcement
Who: You!
What: UnPLUG!
Where: PSU, 1930 SW 4th Ave. Room FAB 86-01 (Lower Level)
When: Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 at 7pm
Why: The pursuit of technology freedom
UnConference? UnPLUG!
I have lots of topics to discuss but you should do the
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:03:12 -0800
John Jason Jordan dijo:
>On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:50:01 -0800
>wes dijo:
>
>>You should remove the Netgear from the network. Once you do that, set
>>your laptop back to 192.168.0.x and everything should work again.
>
>That is not
18 matches
Mail list logo