Thanks Tom,
I thought that I might have overlooked something, based on your earlier
comment.
Do not get me wrong, I am familiar with openWRT. In fact, I am using it
right now when I travel - in one or those small and cheap GL-AR750S.
Performance sucks (10-100Mbs PC to PC over 5GHz wifi max.),
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 17:06:05 -0500
Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> Do you have recommendation for active SDN controller able to manage
> multiple openWRT APs with channel control and client traffic hand off
> between the APs?
>
> The rest of simple network can be managed statically with
> Ansibe/Puppet.
>
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:37:32 -0500
Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> I am not using Edge OS on Ubiquity gear directly - orchestrating SDN
> through Unifi services.
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 15:04 Tom wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:06:09 -0500
> > Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019,
I am not using Edge OS on Ubiquity gear directly - orchestrating SDN
through Unifi services.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 15:04 Tom wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:06:09 -0500
> Tomas Kuchta wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 13:37 tom wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:18:49 -0500
> > > Tomas
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Tom wrote:
Yes really. OpenWRT is miles ahead of EdgeOS and always will be. Just
because people install Linux distros on consumer laptops doesn't make
Linux any less suited for big iron.
EdgeOS has a linux kernel and associated tools. It uses uboot and I (as a
non-computer
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:06:09 -0500
Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 13:37 tom wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:18:49 -0500
> > Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> >
> > > Now, Ubiquity has decided that their products will call home with
> > > data from the internal networks, of course without
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 13:37 tom wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:18:49 -0500
> Tomas Kuchta wrote:
>
> > Now, Ubiquity has decided that their products will call home with
> > data from the internal networks, of course without opt in/out. And of
> > course they think that it is great and they have
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:18:49 -0500
Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> Now, Ubiquity has decided that their products will call home with
> data from the internal networks, of course without opt in/out. And of
> course they think that it is great and they have absolute right to
> use someone else's network for
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, King Beowulf wrote:
I currently have a combination of TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link 10/100/1000
switches scattered about to route data to various rooms, all bought on
sale.
I do tend to prefer metal encased versions, however, as they seem a bit
more resilient to RF
On 11/23/19 8:27 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> While my old LinkSys (non-gigabit) switch worked for years it recently
> died.
> I'm now using a Netgear GS116 gigabit switch and I want a backup unmanaged
> 16-port gigabit switch.
>
> I find them available from Cisco, Netgear, TrendNet, TP-Link, and
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
IMHO they’re all approx. the same. the hardware is typically low(ish)
quality. They typically can’t sustain full bandwidth on all ports at the
same time (eg. an 8 port 1g switch would not be capable of actually
passing 8G of traffic through it at the
IMHO they’re all approx. the same. the hardware is typically low(ish) quality.
They typically can’t sustain full bandwidth on all ports at the same time (eg.
an 8 port 1g switch would not be capable of actually passing 8G of traffic
through it at the same time).
Typically they don’t release
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
These things are commodity, so any of the manufacturers is probably about
the same quality/durability.
Tomas,
That's good to know.
What matters are price, features, management/configuration and design.
Example: If you need vlans, you will need to
These things are commodity, so any of the manufacturers is probably about
the same quality/durability.
I do not believe that anyone has invested a penny in 1Gb unmanaged switch
products in over decade. So, they are essentially the same old products
made by old fabs.
What matters are price,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Rich Shepard wrote:
I'm now using a Netgear GS116 gigabit switch and I want a backup unmanaged
That's a GS316, not GS116.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
While my old LinkSys (non-gigabit) switch worked for years it recently died.
I'm now using a Netgear GS116 gigabit switch and I want a backup unmanaged
16-port gigabit switch.
I find them available from Cisco, Netgear, TrendNet, TP-Link, and D-Link.
Where reviews are provided (Newegg and Amazon)
16 matches
Mail list logo
