On 12/14/2017 06:07 PM, plug-requ...@pdxlinux.org wrote:
I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
the 'back end', i.e., server environment.
I have (some) funding from being laid off when my job was outsourced
overseas (fir the second time).
Your suggestions about t
Measuring with a 'scope with the laptop issuing the command sigrok-cli
--driver mastech-mas345:conn=/dev/ttyUSB0 --samples 10:
triggering on DTR
DTR goes from -6.6V to +7.6V and remains there 'till 9.64s
RX goes from -2.6V to +6.4V for .48s then again at 2.6s,3.12s, etc 'till
7.32s (10 groups of
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, John Bartley K7AAY j...@503bartley.com wrote:
>
> I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
>> the 'back end', i.e., server environment. I have (some) funding from being
>> laid off when my
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> Can you ping the internet from the router? It is plugged in directly.
>>
>> Are you sure you haven't scrambled your ethernet cables?
>
>
> Yes and no From the router, or any other machine on the LAN I can get
> to the dal modem. Can succe
> Can you ping the internet from the router? It is plugged in directly.
>
> Are you sure you haven't scrambled your ethernet cables?
Yes and no From the router, or any other machine on the LAN I can get to
the dal modem. Can successfully ping the dos servers and gateway. One of the
Frontier
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, John Bartley K7AAY j...@503bartley.com wrote:
>
> > I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
> > the 'back end', i.e., server environment. I have (some) funding from
> being
> > laid off when my job was outsourced overseas (fir the second t
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>
>> That makes no sense. They can't see past your router. Your router
>> pretends to be all the devices on your LAN. Does your computer on the LAN
>> have a 192.168.107.x address?
Check out Go. It's from Google. Is one of the latest "cool" languages.
And, it is "cool".
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, John Bartley K7AAY j...@503bartley.com wrote:
To the esteemed members of the PLUG list:
I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
the 'back end', i.
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> That makes no sense. They can't see past your router. Your router
> pretends to be all the devices on your LAN. Does your computer on the LAN
> have a 192.168.107.x address?
>
> The other thing is that Frontier (afaik) uses PPPoE for a
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, John Bartley K7AAY j...@503bartley.com wrote:
I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
the 'back end', i.e., server environment. I have (some) funding from being
laid off when my job was outsourced overseas (fir the second time). Your
suggesti
On Dec 14, 2017 17:41, "Bob Vinisky" wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > Okay, that's the WAN side of your router, what is the LAN network on
> > your router. If it is 192.168.1.x also, then BOOM.
>
> Nope - the LAN side uses 192.168.107.xxx8 (I know, but they say you can
> pick any number in the 192.168 area
To the esteemed members of the PLUG list:
I have determined I must learn programming, and would prefer to do so in
the 'back end', i.e., server environment.
I have (some) funding from being laid off when my job was outsourced
overseas (fir the second time).
Your suggestions about tools and process
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> The model here is that Frontier did something on their modem (updated
> firmware or whatever) that suddenly conflicts with your network. I am
> guessing, and asking questions to confirm or rule out that theory.
>
I would be delighted if
>>
>
> Okay, that's the WAN side of your router, what is the LAN network on
> your router. If it is 192.168.1.x also, then BOOM.
Nope - the LAN side uses 192.168.107.xxx8 (I know, but they say you can pick
any number in the 192.168 area, so I did) - - (so there).
It appears Frontier now want
The model here is that Frontier did something on their modem (updated
firmware or whatever) that suddenly conflicts with your network. I am
guessing, and asking questions to confirm or rule out that theory.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:24 PM,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Couldn’t agree more. To be more precise, when we first were granted dal,
>>> about 5 or so years ago, I had the connection running through Aracnet. My
>>> dal modem ( a Zoom )
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>>
>> Couldn’t agree more. To be more precise, when we first were granted dal,
>> about 5 or so years ago, I had the connection running through Aracnet. My
>> dal modem ( a Zoom ) just bridges the stuff to my lan router, which does all
>> t
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
>> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
>> NAT. Their device shouldn't be abl
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Bob Vinisky wrote:
Two days ago ip traffic ceased in our (residential) Frontier dal line. The
modem is up and running correctly, but no traffic in or out.
Bob,
Before SpiritOne lost their mail and web servers I connected to them
through my Netgear VFS318 router connecte
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
> NAT. Their device shouldn't be able to tell that all the traffic
> isn't coming from that router
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Bob Vinisky wrote:
A second request is for a recommendation for a decent sip, if one still
exists. I, too, am a refugee from Aracnet, and want to get away from this
mess soon
Bob,
If you're running a business Frontier has their 15/5 Mbps voice/fiber Internet
package fo
From your LAN, log in to the router (I assume it has an admin
interface). What are the WAN and LAN networks?
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your rout
That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
NAT. Their device shouldn't be able to tell that all the traffic
isn't coming from that router. They shouldn't be able to see any of
the hosts on your LAN.
On
Greetings,
Two days ago ip traffic ceased in our (residential) Frontier dal line. The
modem is up and running correctly, but no traffic in or out. After two entire
days of conversing with various “techs” it became apparent my issue was in
using a router to feed the lan machines to the modem. Ho
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
And the postfix main.cf, does it include:
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891
non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters
milter_default_action = accept
milter_protocol = 2
??
Michael,
Yes:
smtpd_milters = inet:
And the postfix main.cf, does it include:
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891
non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters
milter_default_action = accept
milter_protocol = 2
??
On 2017-12-14 09:23, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Copie
The optocouplers in the dmm are reportedly TLV817B. The emitter resistor
on the output npn is shown on the schematic to be 1.5K. I measured it to
be 7.35K. The input resistor in series with the LED is listed as 3.3K. I
have not opened the dmm to see if the schematic is accurate. I agree that
t
On 12/13/17 23:03, Russell Senior wrote:
> The precise levels are not supposed to make a difference. Below a
> negative threshold and above a positive threshold should be enough.
> From memory, original RS232 was +/- 12V, but any remotely modern PC
> would use +/- 5V-ish.
And the reality is that
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Copies of the relevant sections of the config files would go a long way in
enabling people to offer help.
Just sayin.
Michael,
Of course. I didn't post them to the list thinking it would be more
appropriate to an individual. However, ...
/etc
Copies of the relevant sections of the config files would go a long way
in enabling people to offer help.
Just sayin.
On 2017-12-14 08:26, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've been trying unsuccessfully to determine why opendkim is not found
by
verifier.port25.com when it seems to be correctly configured
I've been trying unsuccessfully to determine why opendkim is not found by
verifier.port25.com when it seems to be correctly configured and installed
here with postfix-3.2.4.
On the web I found different instructions for configuring the package, and
the SlackBuilds.org instructions seem to be
31 matches
Mail list logo
