Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Michael Barnes
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:53 PM John Jason Jordan  wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:22:52 -0700
> Michael Barnes  dijo:
>
> >Actually, I just hosted a conference tonight, finished a few minutes
> >ago. We had five attendees.
>
> What are the maximum number of attendees that the presenter can see on
> their screen? Are the images on the presenter's screen live, as the
> presentation continues?
> __
>

For these types of meetings, we ask people do not activate their cameras.
When they do, there is a limit of five camera users. The presenter will see
them all live. It does eat up a lot of bandwidth. Not practical for a large
meeting. Better for just a few people.

Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread John Jason Jordan
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:22:52 -0700
Michael Barnes  dijo:

>Actually, I just hosted a conference tonight, finished a few minutes
>ago. We had five attendees.

What are the maximum number of attendees that the presenter can see on
their screen? Are the images on the presenter's screen live, as the
presentation continues?
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Buzzing speakers - SOLVED!

2020-03-26 Thread Denis Heidtmann
A cold solder joint can rectify.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:30 PM Michael Barnes 
wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:41 PM David  wrote:
>
> > On 3/25/20 8:43 PM, Michael Barnes wrote:
> > -- clip --
> > >
> > >
> > > Source of problem discovered. Still working on why. My APRS base
> station
> > > beacons every 30 minutes. For some reason, I recently started getting
> > some
> > > RFI into  things, this speaker being one of them. Just happened to be
> > > looking at the APRS screen when it transmitted and heard the buzz at
> the
> > > same time.  Now to figure out and solve why the RFI is only recently
> > > getting into things.
> >
> >
> > I have limited little knowledge about APRS and my HT is analog so, along
> > with being green, I don't have much to offer here.
> >
> > The questions that spring to mind are:
> >
> > * has an antenna been added, removed, or relocated recently?
> > * has the power source for the speaker or base station changed?
> > * proper grounding on the base station?
> > * what happens if you hit TX on your base station for voice?
> >
> > A ferrite choke may be all that is needed, but I'm not sure where it
> > would need to be positioned.
> >
> > dafr
> > _
> >
>
> It seems the problem is pretty much limited to that particular set of
> speakers.  I moved them around to other applications with similar results.
> Had the problem existed when I was on another radio, I would have
> immediately correlated it to RFI. Since it was picking up the APRS radio,
> which just sits there doing its thing pretty much unnoticed, it never
> crossed my mind. Changed speakers, problem gone. I'll have to dig into
> these and try to find why they have such a problem and nothing else does.
> Thanks for everyone's comments.
>
> Michael WA7SKG
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Buzzing speakers - SOLVED!

2020-03-26 Thread Michael Barnes
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:41 PM David  wrote:

> On 3/25/20 8:43 PM, Michael Barnes wrote:
> -- clip --
> >
> >
> > Source of problem discovered. Still working on why. My APRS base station
> > beacons every 30 minutes. For some reason, I recently started getting
> some
> > RFI into  things, this speaker being one of them. Just happened to be
> > looking at the APRS screen when it transmitted and heard the buzz at the
> > same time.  Now to figure out and solve why the RFI is only recently
> > getting into things.
>
>
> I have limited little knowledge about APRS and my HT is analog so, along
> with being green, I don't have much to offer here.
>
> The questions that spring to mind are:
>
> * has an antenna been added, removed, or relocated recently?
> * has the power source for the speaker or base station changed?
> * proper grounding on the base station?
> * what happens if you hit TX on your base station for voice?
>
> A ferrite choke may be all that is needed, but I'm not sure where it
> would need to be positioned.
>
> dafr
> _
>

It seems the problem is pretty much limited to that particular set of
speakers.  I moved them around to other applications with similar results.
Had the problem existed when I was on another radio, I would have
immediately correlated it to RFI. Since it was picking up the APRS radio,
which just sits there doing its thing pretty much unnoticed, it never
crossed my mind. Changed speakers, problem gone. I'll have to dig into
these and try to find why they have such a problem and nothing else does.
Thanks for everyone's comments.

Michael WA7SKG
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Michael Barnes
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rich Shepard 
wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Michael Barnes wrote:
>
> > I have participated in a bunch of webinars and the video was always one
> > way. Participants had two way audio and could comment and ask questions,
> > nobody could see them. Other than seeing who is sleeping or left the
> room,
> > I see little value in two way video for presentations. Granted, your
> > situation may be different. Maybe you are doing soap carvings and want to
> > see everybody's work. In that case, you may want to go with a paid
> > subscription that allows up to 100 video participants.
>
> Michael,
>
> Participating might be different from hosting a webinar. I downloaded FCC's
> desktop app (not yet installed), and read the instructions for voice and
> video conferencing.
>
> Voice conferences are all done with a phone (landline or mobile);
> easy-peasy.
>
> Webinars and video coferences (webinars with host providing video and
> participants seeing it, both sides having audio connection, or video
> conferences with all participants seeing each other) looks like a problem.
> From the web site's instructions:
>
> "To host an online meeting with Web Viewer:
>
> Using Chromebook (only Chromebook supports full host functionality at
> this time), log in to your online account and navigate to your Meeting
> Wall."
>
> Feh! I didn't look to see what subset of full host functionality the rest
> of
> the user world has.
>
> Have you hosted a video conference or presented a webinar with FCC?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>

Actually, I just hosted a conference tonight, finished a few minutes ago.
We had five attendees. We started with me sharing my desktop and showed a
couple of applications. Then I showed a DVD followed by a short video file
I had on my computer. All participants were able to see and hear
everything. All participants were able to comment and were heard by
everyone. I did request everybody mute their microphones during the video
just to minimize unrelated noise.  After the video, there was open
discussion, which seemed to go well. Towards the end, I allowed those who
had cameras to turn them on and we could all see each other. Whoever was
talking took focus and was on the main screen while the others were visible
on the side.  During the meeting one of the other attendees wanted to
discuss something and I switched presenters to him and he was able to show
his desktop and bring up a website that all could see as he discussed the
topic.

As host, I did need to download and use the the app, but the attendees only
needed to use their web browsers. I am running Linux Mint and had no
problems. I'm not sure what functionality I was missing, as I was using the
app, not my browser. I do use the Firefox browser on my wife's computer,
also Linux Mint, and did not see anything she was missing.

Now that I finally got things working the way I wanted, I'll be happy to
host any demos anybody might be interested in.

Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Buzzing speakers - SOLVED!

2020-03-26 Thread David

On 3/25/20 8:43 PM, Michael Barnes wrote:
-- clip --



Source of problem discovered. Still working on why. My APRS base station
beacons every 30 minutes. For some reason, I recently started getting some
RFI into  things, this speaker being one of them. Just happened to be
looking at the APRS screen when it transmitted and heard the buzz at the
same time.  Now to figure out and solve why the RFI is only recently
getting into things.



I have limited little knowledge about APRS and my HT is analog so, along 
with being green, I don't have much to offer here.


The questions that spring to mind are:

* has an antenna been added, removed, or relocated recently?
* has the power source for the speaker or base station changed?
* proper grounding on the base station?
* what happens if you hit TX on your base station for voice?

A ferrite choke may be all that is needed, but I'm not sure where it 
would need to be positioned.


dafr
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] git: remove all deleted files from status report [RESOLVED]

2020-03-26 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, tomas.kuchta.li...@gmail.com wrote:


Same as with git add, you will need to git commit after git rm
Until you commit your changes all files will show up.


Tomas,

Mea culpa! I thought that I had run 'git commit' after 'git add -u .', but I
hadn't.

Now that I've created the menu for the application I added all changes and
removed the deleted files, then committed all changes. The many deleted
files no longer appear in the status report.

Thanks,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Michael Barnes wrote:


I have participated in a bunch of webinars and the video was always one
way. Participants had two way audio and could comment and ask questions,
nobody could see them. Other than seeing who is sleeping or left the room,
I see little value in two way video for presentations. Granted, your
situation may be different. Maybe you are doing soap carvings and want to
see everybody's work. In that case, you may want to go with a paid
subscription that allows up to 100 video participants.


Michael,

Participating might be different from hosting a webinar. I downloaded FCC's
desktop app (not yet installed), and read the instructions for voice and
video conferencing.

Voice conferences are all done with a phone (landline or mobile);
easy-peasy.

Webinars and video coferences (webinars with host providing video and
participants seeing it, both sides having audio connection, or video
conferences with all participants seeing each other) looks like a problem.

From the web site's instructions:


"To host an online meeting with Web Viewer:

Using Chromebook (only Chromebook supports full host functionality at
this time), log in to your online account and navigate to your Meeting
Wall."

Feh! I didn't look to see what subset of full host functionality the rest of
the user world has.

Have you hosted a video conference or presented a webinar with FCC?

Regards,

Rich

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Michael Barnes
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, 05:39 Rich Shepard  wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Michael Barnes wrote:
>
> > I just did two video conference calls today. Works fine. At the bottom
> > left of the screen should be three icons, microphone, telephone handset,
> > and video camera. The mic symbol mutes your mic, the handset turns audio
> > on and off, and the camera turns your video camera on and off.
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for clarifying.
>
> > I think there is a limitation of 5 video users at once,
>
> Huh! I'll check this because one potential use for me is offering on-line
> presentations (webinars?) to whomever signed up to watch, listen, and
> participate.
>
> > If anyone is interested in testing FreeConferenceCall, they can contact
> me
> > and I'll set up a session you can log into and check it out.
>
> When the camera eventually arrives and I learn how to get it working I'll
> accept your offer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>
> I have participated in a bunch of webinars and the video was always one
> way. Participants had two way audio and could comment and ask questions,
> nobody could see them. Other than seeing who is sleeping or left the room,
> I see little value in two way video for presentations. Granted, your
> situation may be different. Maybe you are doing soap carvings and want to
> see everybody's work. In that case, you may want to go with a paid
> subscription that allows up to 100 video participants.


Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Remote video conferencing [RESOLVED]

2020-03-26 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Denis Heidtmann wrote:


I was just part of a Zoom call where one of the participants used just his
phone and he seemed to be able to see all of us.


Denis,

Thanks for the information. I'll call in to Friday's conference.

Regards,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Michael Barnes wrote:


I just did two video conference calls today. Works fine. At the bottom
left of the screen should be three icons, microphone, telephone handset,
and video camera. The mic symbol mutes your mic, the handset turns audio
on and off, and the camera turns your video camera on and off.


Michael,

Thanks for clarifying.


I think there is a limitation of 5 video users at once,


Huh! I'll check this because one potential use for me is offering on-line
presentations (webinars?) to whomever signed up to watch, listen, and
participate.


If anyone is interested in testing FreeConferenceCall, they can contact me
and I'll set up a session you can log into and check it out.


When the camera eventually arrives and I learn how to get it working I'll
accept your offer.

Regards,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Feedback wanted: Virtual PLUG Events

2020-03-26 Thread Michael Barnes
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 9:45 PM John Jason Jordan  wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:30:43 -0700
> Michael Barnes  dijo:
>
> >I just did two video conference calls today.  Works fine. At the bottom
> >left of the screen should be three icons, microphone, telephone
> >handset, and video camera. The mic symbol mutes your mic, the handset
> >turns audio on and off, and the camera turns your video camera on and
> >off. I think there is a limitation of 5 video users at once, I haven't
> >used it with more than three. Normally, we use it with everybody on
> >audio only and the presenter shares his desktop. The one glitch I have
> >found right now is in trying to show a video. The picture comes
> >through, but the attendees cannot hear the audio.
>
> If you are a presenter at a PLUG virtual talk with FCC, will you see
> the faces of all who are connected and have their cameras turned on, or
> just five of them?
>
> >If anyone is interested in testing FreeConferenceCall, they can
> >contact me and I'll set up a session you can log into and check it out.
>
> Perhaps setting up a date/time for this would be useful.
>

There are basically two types of video conference. Video interactive and
presentation. With video interactive, each participant has a camera turned
on and all attendees can see each other. With FCC's free account, an
interactive video conference may have up to five participants and may last
up to 12 hours. With a paid subscription, you may have up to 100
participants for an unlimited time. Of course the more you have the more
unwieldy it gets and the more bandwidth is needed. With a presentation, the
host shares his desktop applications or video camera. It is a one to many
type of thing. All participants have two way audio, but the video is only
one way. The host does have the option of designating another attendee as
presenter who can share his desktop to everyone.
A video interactive session is good for individualized training, a
committee meeting, or other small group where seeing each other is
beneficial. The presentation is good for large lecture classes amd club or
organization meetings.

FCC has a recording function to record and archive the meeting. It also has
document sharing and a chat ability. You can chat individually between
attendees or with the group.

I suppose I could set up a demo conference. What would be a good day and
time? I could probably set up several of them. For some reason, I seem to
have a lot of free time at home these days. I can do either a small group
video conference or a presentation demo.

Michael
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug