> On Dec 16, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> I am not sure he's able to ping an ip address off-site, but the
> reports have been too fragmentary to really tell.
>
My reports were not making much sense partially because the entire issue has
been so cloudy.
I now have the issue res
I am not sure he's able to ping an ip address off-site, but the
reports have been too fragmentary to really tell.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Kuchta
wrote:
> Unless I missed something, it seems pretty simple - Bob has demonstrated
> that he is able to ping IPs from LAN behind his route
Unless I missed something, it seems pretty simple - Bob has demonstrated
that he is able to ping IPs from LAN behind his router. What he cannot do
is to ping URLs such as www.google.com.
So, he needs to fix DNS forwarding at the router, so that the router can
properly hand DNS configuration to the
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Ishak Micheil wrote:
>
> I think we're trying to solve the easy path of egress traffic, which is
> good.
> Yes, indeed validate by simple nslookup www.google.com
> Or
> 8.8.8.8
>
>
> Do I understand correctly that no ingress traffic too? How did u validate
> that
I think we're trying to solve the easy path of egress traffic, which is
good.
Yes, indeed validate by simple nslookup www.google.com
Or
8.8.8.8
Do I understand correctly that no ingress traffic too? How did u validate
that? If the answer is yes, then it's frontier that should be able to help
you.
> When you say you "could ping" to somewhere, it is also important to
> say where you are pinging from. That is, from the router? from a
> device on your LAN? from a device on the DSL modem's LAN?
>
the question was — "with your router connected to DSL modem and a PC to LAN:”
I took that to
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
> From earlier tests: Yes I could ping both the LAN and WAN ip’s of the router
> (192.168.107.2 and 192,168,1,2), the ip of the DSL modem, 192.168.1.1. Could
> not get google, from either the ip or www.google.com.
When you say you "could ping"
You have/had DNS resolution problem.
Couple of ways to solve that on the router:
A) let router pick DNS by DHCP from WAN side
B) configure the router to use ISPs DNS servers by typing in their IPs. You
could get them by: cat /etc/resolved.conf while being connected to the DSL
modem directly.
C) us
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>>
>> To be accurate, I’m in a no-pc zone. We have Macs and Linux here only. I’ve
>> actually only spent an hour or two on the m$ side of the world. No DOS, no
>> windows. I was testing on a Mac because it was closest to the DSL modem
>> .
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 15, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>
>> Fwiw, I am very interested to hear why a PC works and your router does
>> not, because that makes zero sense from your description.
>>
>> Russell
>
> To be accurate, I’m in a no-p
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Bob,
>
> This should absolutely work - Unless you have some mis-configured routing
> or DNS. Despite what you hear about the use of ISP gear only.
>
> Let's diagnose this a little - with your router connected to DSL modem and
> a
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> Fwiw, I am very interested to hear why a PC works and your router does
> not, because that makes zero sense from your description.
>
> Russell
To be accurate, I’m in a no-pc zone. We have Macs and Linux here only. I’ve
actually only spe
Thanks Bob,
This should absolutely work - Unless you have some mis-configured routing
or DNS. Despite what you hear about the use of ISP gear only.
Let's diagnose this a little - with your router connected to DSL modem and
a PC to LAN:
* Can you ping 8.8.8.8 ?
* Can you ping 192.168.107.1 ?
* Can
Fwiw, I am very interested to hear why a PC works and your router does
not, because that makes zero sense from your description.
Russell
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 15, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Tomas Kuchta
>> wrote:
>>
>> Bob,
>>
>> Russell was asking a few questi
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Russell was asking a few questions and after this long, there is still no
> clear and definite answer.
>
> Could you please try to contain your frustrations and answer that, and only
> that? There is no help possible without kn
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Tomas Kuchta
wrote:
> 1. What is this "dal" - what does that abbreviation mean?
dal is his phone autocorrecting DSL, I think. Also "sip" == ISP.
Russell
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.or
Bob,
Russell was asking a few questions and after this long, there is still no
clear and definite answer.
Could you please try to contain your frustrations and answer that, and only
that? There is no help possible without knowing the facts.
1. What is this "dal" - what does that abbreviation mea
Bob Vinisky(b...@cherrycreekdaffodils.com)@Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 06:32:02PM
-0800:
>
> > Can you ping the internet from the router? It is plugged in directly.
> >
> > Are you sure you haven't scrambled your ethernet cables?
>
>
> Yes and no From the router, or any other machine on the LAN I c
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> Can you ping the internet from the router? It is plugged in directly.
>>
>> Are you sure you haven't scrambled your ethernet cables?
>
>
> Yes and no From the router, or any other machine on the LAN I can get
> to the dal modem. Can succe
> Can you ping the internet from the router? It is plugged in directly.
>
> Are you sure you haven't scrambled your ethernet cables?
Yes and no From the router, or any other machine on the LAN I can get to
the dal modem. Can successfully ping the dos servers and gateway. One of the
Frontier
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>
>> That makes no sense. They can't see past your router. Your router
>> pretends to be all the devices on your LAN. Does your computer on the LAN
>> have a 192.168.107.x address?
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> That makes no sense. They can't see past your router. Your router
> pretends to be all the devices on your LAN. Does your computer on the LAN
> have a 192.168.107.x address?
>
> The other thing is that Frontier (afaik) uses PPPoE for a
On Dec 14, 2017 17:41, "Bob Vinisky" wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > Okay, that's the WAN side of your router, what is the LAN network on
> > your router. If it is 192.168.1.x also, then BOOM.
>
> Nope - the LAN side uses 192.168.107.xxx8 (I know, but they say you can
> pick any number in the 192.168 area
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> The model here is that Frontier did something on their modem (updated
> firmware or whatever) that suddenly conflicts with your network. I am
> guessing, and asking questions to confirm or rule out that theory.
>
I would be delighted if
>>
>
> Okay, that's the WAN side of your router, what is the LAN network on
> your router. If it is 192.168.1.x also, then BOOM.
Nope - the LAN side uses 192.168.107.xxx8 (I know, but they say you can pick
any number in the 192.168 area, so I did) - - (so there).
It appears Frontier now want
The model here is that Frontier did something on their modem (updated
firmware or whatever) that suddenly conflicts with your network. I am
guessing, and asking questions to confirm or rule out that theory.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:24 PM,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Couldn’t agree more. To be more precise, when we first were granted dal,
>>> about 5 or so years ago, I had the connection running through Aracnet. My
>>> dal modem ( a Zoom )
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>>
>> Couldn’t agree more. To be more precise, when we first were granted dal,
>> about 5 or so years ago, I had the connection running through Aracnet. My
>> dal modem ( a Zoom ) just bridges the stuff to my lan router, which does all
>> t
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Bob Vinisky
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior
>> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
>> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
>> NAT. Their device shouldn't be abl
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Bob Vinisky wrote:
Two days ago ip traffic ceased in our (residential) Frontier dal line. The
modem is up and running correctly, but no traffic in or out.
Bob,
Before SpiritOne lost their mail and web servers I connected to them
through my Netgear VFS318 router connecte
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
> NAT. Their device shouldn't be able to tell that all the traffic
> isn't coming from that router
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Bob Vinisky wrote:
A second request is for a recommendation for a decent sip, if one still
exists. I, too, am a refugee from Aracnet, and want to get away from this
mess soon
Bob,
If you're running a business Frontier has their 15/5 Mbps voice/fiber Internet
package fo
From your LAN, log in to the router (I assume it has an admin
interface). What are the WAN and LAN networks?
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
> their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your rout
That sounds extremely unlikely. It is possible that your router and
their modem have the same (conflicting) network. Your router should
NAT. Their device shouldn't be able to tell that all the traffic
isn't coming from that router. They shouldn't be able to see any of
the hosts on your LAN.
On
Greetings,
Two days ago ip traffic ceased in our (residential) Frontier dal line. The
modem is up and running correctly, but no traffic in or out. After two entire
days of conversing with various “techs” it became apparent my issue was in
using a router to feed the lan machines to the modem. Ho
35 matches
Mail list logo
