Actually, if you have some clout, AT or most providers will give you a
dedicated apn for your biz to connect cellular direct devices to a
dedicated circuit, and you mpls route to them via that way as a private
cellular network.
We use that at my client today and before, it's useful, att,
On Starlink, now that you mention it, I'm kinda curious too. What *do*
they allow for ports? I've been on a list asking for a starlink for years,
but I don't tweet with twits, so guess I don't get invited.
My guess: They treat it like a cellco, ie all cgnat with no inbound ports,
only outbound.
Looks like SPF records were added. Would be better if DKIM and DMARC were added
as well.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, at 1:56 PM, Brian Cluff via PLUG-discuss wrote:
> It looks like I was finally able to get someone at cloudmark to listen
> to me and the PLUG email is now getting through again. For
T-Mobile, and for that matter Starlink, don't give you the options of port
forwarding or any kind of DMZ, and therefore you're effectively unable to
directly access any resource past the gateway.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, at 1:21 PM, Joe Neglia via PLUG-discuss wrote:
> Slightly OT but somewhat
Yes I know the FCC auctioned off what were tv channels and cell phone
companies paid for them. From having lived in rural areas of Arizona
for much of my life, I can say from experience that the UHF channels
from Phoenix didn't reach out into rural areas very well. At one time
Phoenix had
It looks like I was finally able to get someone at cloudmark to listen
to me and the PLUG email is now getting through again. For everyone
that hasn't been receiving PLUG email for the last couple of weeks,
welcome back. Please check the PLUG mailing list archive for what
you've missed.
Slightly OT but somewhat related questions:
1) Are web servers allowed on these cell-based ISPs?
2) What about Starlink?
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> I laugh when I read something about these moonbats who go on about 5G
signals being hazardous to human health.
Agreed, if only they understood what they do every day that is far worse
for their health.
>> My guess is that T Mobile's service went down the crapper because people
signed up for
The UHF TV channels were hardly used, mainly for servicing rural areas. Large
densely populated areas did not use them. And the FCC tended to allocate the
lower-end frequencies first. So not many people got exposed to the upper-band
emissions.
None of this airspace was “given away” to anybody.
What the carriers are calling 5G is a portion of the 5G standards that
don't provide the high speed service that the mmwave tech does. For the
last 40 years, the FCC has been handing over to cell phone companies
chunks of spectrum that previously were reserved for over the air
television.
10 matches
Mail list logo