I'll try to say something within a week...
Rusty
-----Original Message-
From: PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf
Of Matthew Crews
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 1:23 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: RE: Samsung SSDs - Am at the end of li
Mathew,
Thanks for the clarification!
Mark
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Crews
wrote:
> You want to ignore the “Raw Value” column outright, and instead look at the
> “Value” column. That is showing you still have a relatively healthy SSD.
>
> Keep in mind that some form of reallocat
You want to ignore the “Raw Value” column outright, and instead look at the
“Value” column. That is showing you still have a relatively healthy SSD.
Keep in mind that some form of reallocation and wear leveling is normal, and
to be expected. When this value gets very low, you can start worrying ab
Matthew,
I am still confused. If the wear leveling count counts back from 100, one
drive has a raw value of 3 and the other one has a raw value of 22.
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 098 098 0
My understanding is that wear leveling count, and other associated values,
start at 100 and count down to 0.
I think you are fine. That said, I would always try to limit the number of
write cycles to an SSD as much as possible to maximize life. That said you
could probably write a petabyte to a ty
I ran GSmartControl on my two SSDs (Ubuntu 14.04 laptop), and I see a lot
of pre-fail indicators in the reports (attached). Does this mean I am
approaching the drives end of life and I need to replace them?
I have also read that each SSD manufacturer codes the SMART attributes
differently (
https:
