Shame on you Kurt for thinking that Red Hat should pander to your SuSE
driven expectations.
Though I'm not much interested in the thread anymore, I still find the
psychology of it all pretty interesting.
In essence, it is similar to people fleeing California (because California
sucks?) to
Hi all,
After having installed several distros and actually building a new
computer, I finally found out on the net why I was having so much
trouble with Qwest DSL. The default DNS numbers were wrong. The solution:
System Administrator Network DNS TAB:
Primary DNS = 205.171.2.65
I assume your talking about SuSE.
Mike Garfias wrote:
I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files.
I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure
directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change.
On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Dan Lund wrote:
This argument has gone on since the beginning of Red Hat being the
Windows of Linux. Thankfully Red Hat has done a bit of shifting in
their strategy and become less like that.
It smacks of remnants of that argument, just completely backwards...
back then it was people saying that it's better to
On 8/10/07, der.hans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The firstboot routine is a script, isn't it? Can it be run again later to
go through the same questions for setting up the system?
Yes, edit /etc/sysconfig/firstboot and set to YES/
Daniel
--
|
got your message... ill get back to you soon. thanks, jmz
--
.. communication.
.0001. development.
.0010. strategy.
.0100. appeal.
JOSHUA M. ZEIDNER
IT Consultant
( 602 ) 490 8006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files.
I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure
directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change.
On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Dan Lund wrote:
This argument has gone on since the beginning of Red Hat
Am 09. Aug, 2007 schw�tzte Craig White so:
hostname ethernet configurations, date/time, etc. are also part of the
'firstboot' routine which apparently wasn't included in your 'image'
either - too bad...not Red Hat's fault.
The firstboot routine is a script, isn't it? Can it be run again
actually i'm mostly bitching about RH
i found suse to be even worse the one time i tried it
have since refused to touch it
On Aug 10, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Dan Lund wrote:
I assume your talking about SuSE.
Mike Garfias wrote:
I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files.
I do mind some
My company is looking for JR to Mid-Level Linux Systems Administrator
position. I have
attached below the job description. If interested please send your
resume to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junior-Mid Level Systems/Network Administrator
myGeek is currently seeking a Junior to Mid Level
.
It would be very beneficial, in many respects, if the PLUG website
could include a gallery of introductory bios and photos of as
many PLUG members as may be willing to participate.
A preliminary list of reasons and benefits for doing this, along
with a few very preliminary examples of how this
Okay, because you confused me... Red Hat doesn't bury the settings, so
that's probably what confused me.
/etc and /etc/sysconfig
Mike Garfias wrote:
actually i'm mostly bitching about RH
i found suse to be even worse the one time i tried it
have since refused to touch it
On Aug 10,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:51:40PM -0700, Mike Garfias wrote:
RH puts many things in /etc/sysconfig that belong in either the top
level /etc dir or their own dir under /etc (ex: /etc/apache/)
granted some are in the right place, but at best its an inconsistent
mess
also another bitch:
13 matches
Mail list logo
