On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Craig White wrote:
It no longer matters what was in the Washington Post story.
What is absurd is your contention that happened on January 3 can
somehow render a falsehood printed on December 30th true.
or to use Rudy who articulates these things with a
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Craig White wrote:
It's possible given that this case was
dropped and then refiled by RIAA that RIAA will drop it and possibly
have to cover the legal costs of Weed...that has happened several
times
so far and my reading of this is that is entirely possible
Here is an open source and open hardware (they publish the hardware
specs) box that records what ever and then converts it to mpeg 4. I
thought some people on the list may be interested.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/business/06novel.html?_r=3ref=businessoref=sloginoref=sloginoref=slogin
It appears to be redirecting to a URL via a HTTP GET statement (?dlurl=)
and then passing the referral URL along (the original link with Boingo
in the name) then again redirecting back, and forward again, etc. Yes,
it looks odd. Chances are the URL was programmed to receive a
particular
I've heard lots of people over the years complain about Sprint, Verizon,
ATT/Cingular/MCI. Some I have agreed with and witnessed personally, some
I have not. I recently stumbled upon the worst I have seen so far.
Quick background story, I was helping a friend who lives in Canada setup
a
.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:02, Shawn Badger wrote
Here is an open source and open hardware (they publish the hardware
specs) box that records what ever and then converts it to mpeg 4.
I thought some people on the list may be interested.
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 06:22 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Craig White wrote:
It's possible given that this case was
dropped and then refiled by RIAA that RIAA will drop it and possibly
have to cover the legal costs of Weed...that has happened several
times
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 05:48 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Craig White wrote:
It no longer matters what was in the Washington Post story.
What is absurd is your contention that happened on January 3 can
somehow render a falsehood printed on December 30th
I have dozens of servers, all of them running the most recent Debian
stable branch and pretty basic iptables instances. All are working well
except for two of them... On these two problem servers, iptables seems to
be intermittently stopping and starting. There is nothing in the system
logs
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 10:12 -0700, Jay wrote:
I have dozens of servers, all of them running the most recent Debian
stable branch and pretty basic iptables instances. All are working well
except for two of them... On these two problem servers, iptables seems to
be intermittently stopping
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Craig White wrote:
The public relations aspect is clearly of lesser concern...look at
Thomas, a single mother. On a scale of public relations nightmares,
picking on old ladies, young children, young mothers with children are
the next least desirable from a public
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 10:31 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Craig White wrote:
The public relations aspect is clearly of lesser concern...look at
Thomas, a single mother. On a scale of public relations nightmares,
picking on old ladies, young children, young
It doesn't do HD yet!! I use my HDTV card for that currently.
On Jan 7, 2008 9:39 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:02, Shawn Badger wrote
Here is an open source and open hardware (they publish the hardware
specs) box that records what ever and then converts
I have played with one and have been happy with it so far, but the one
big catch that I found is it only odes ATSC (digital tv). That kind of
killed for what I purchased it for originally.
On Jan 7, 2008 9:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josef Lowder wrote:
.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:02,
What Tony describes is correct, the cause of which is of course
suspect. I don't mean to be alarmist or to even say what was going on
was definitively nefarious, but I can say with certainty that airports
are rife with hackers or wanna-be hackers testing their mettle and
tools. Please beware.
For
btw- someone has been trying to sell a Hauppauge TV Tuner Card on
Tucson Craigslist. Currently the price is at $30. Hauppauge hardware
has excellent linux support and can be used with the MythTV platform.
http://tucson.craigslist.org/sys/525126977.html
-jmz
On 1/7/08, Shawn Badger
On 1/7/08, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have dozens of servers, all of them running the most recent Debian
stable branch and pretty basic iptables instances. All are working well
except for two of them... On these two problem servers, iptables seems to
be intermittently stopping and
A few quesitons:
1) Why do you have a service listening on this port if you intend to
block all traffic to it?
2) Are there any other services that might be exposed if iptables are
reset? or is sunrpc the only one?
3) What logs do you have with normal operation?
I would recommend removing all
sorry, it means that it can only receive the digital tv signals. This
really isn't a problem if you are using hooked up to an antenna
because everything is simulcasted on both analog and digital channels.
If you however want to watch it tied to cox cable, you will only see
the channels that are in
On Jan 7, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Craig White wrote:
OK, accepting that, why on earth did you say that you expected them to
drop the Howell case?
You seem to flip your opinions around from one post to the next.
What I said was that unless they could prove he actually erased files
from his disk
On 1/7/08, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 05:48 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Craig White wrote:
It no longer matters what was in the Washington Post story.
What is absurd is your contention that happened on January 3 can
I would check netstat during the scan to see if nmap is in fact
connecting and I would also just watch the iptables service and see if
you see it go away during the scan. These are just a couple places
that I would start with.
On Jan 7, 2008 12:12 PM, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Shawn Badger wrote:
I would check netstat during the scan to see if nmap is in fact
connecting and I would also just watch the iptables service and see if
you see it go away during the scan. These are just a couple places
that I would start with.
Unfortunately, already
On 1/7/08, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
That is not really a safe assumption. Nmap is not really that
accurate of an instrument. If you are concerned for some other
I have tried two port scanners (one being nmap, and two versions of nmap
at
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:10 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Craig White wrote:
OK, accepting that, why on earth did you say that you expected them to
drop the Howell case?
You seem to flip your opinions around from one post to the next.
What I said was that
Am 07. Jan, 2008 schwätzte Charles Jones so:
Attached is a link to a screenshot
http://www.the-ownage.com/gallery/albums/Miscellaneous/rogersucks.png of
what I received. I couldn't believe it. For anyone who doesn't want to click
the link, here is a summary:
* No matter what subject he
Local channels in HD? Others? Facinating. I'd be really interested to
know which others you were able to see. As I mentioned, I have a
pcHDTV lying around that I wouldn't mind putting to good
use...depending of course what those channels are.
:)
- Erich
--
A man is defined by the questions
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Erich Newell wrote:
How often does this cycle back and forth? Can you make any kind of
prediction whether or not it will be up?
I have not been able to accurately predict it, but the cycles seem to be
anywhere from a few seconds to a minute or two. I just did 10 scans,
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:52 -0700, Jay wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Erich Newell wrote:
How often does this cycle back and forth? Can you make any kind of
prediction whether or not it will be up?
I have not been able to accurately predict it, but the cycles seem to be
anywhere from a
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
Is this a custom kernel?
Nope - standard kernel from Debian stable:
# uname -a
Linux server 2.6.18-5-686 #1 SMP Sat Dec 1 22:58:58 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
--
~Jay
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
On 1/7/08, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
using arent just some UI for Nmap. Is this machine running IP tables
some kind of gateway/firewall?
I just repeated with good ole' telnet.
you're verifying *what* with telnet exactly? That the ports are
Bluetooth has nothing to do with the phone network. It's a wireless standard
between two devices. Carriers (Verizon comes to mind) that have been known to
cripple or disable Bluetooth file transfer on their phones so you have to use
their network (and be charged by them). Is this what you
Bluetooth has nothing to do with the phone network. It's a wireless standard
between two devices. Carriers (Verizon comes to mind) that have been known to
cripple or disable Bluetooth file transfer on their phones so you have to use
their network (and be charged by them). Is this what you
I recently pre-ordered the newer model of this
http://www.tvix.co.kr/Eng/products/4100sh.aspx
I'll post a review once I get it (week or two).
My minimum requirements were:
* 1080P playback
* Video playback of h.264 .mkv files w/subtitles
* Video playback of DIVX and h.264 .avi files
* Audio
Am 07. Jan, 2008 schwätzte Jon M. Hanson so:
Bluetooth has nothing to do with the phone network. It's a wireless standard
between two devices. Carriers (Verizon comes to mind) that have been known to
cripple or disable Bluetooth file transfer on their phones so you have to use
their network
The HDHomeRun is QAM compatible. All 'local' channels are mandated by the
FCC to be carried unencrypted over basic cable and are generally available
using a QAM (Quadrature amplitude modulation) compatible tuner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAM_tuner
On Jan 7, 2008 1:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will try and get some time to hook it back up again tonight and let
you know what channels I find. If I remember correctly they are in the
700 range and you can see them with the cable plugged directly into
your HD TV as well.
On Jan 7, 2008 12:42 PM, Erich Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curiously enough, RIAA is well aware that software such as Kazaa, often
shares files/folders without the users having knowledge of that fact...
http://www.ftc.gov/reports/p2p05/050623p2prpt.pdf
See page 8 (and thereabouts)
This was a report issued by the FTC and RIAA was party to the hearings
On 1/6/08, Chris Gehlker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
http://www.crazyaviation.com/images/Windows.jpg
No offense, but would you please include something more than just a
link
so that list users have some idea of what it is they are going to
On Jan 7, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Craig White wrote:
so now they will drop the case because 'pursuing the case futher will
not be cost effective from a purely financial point of view'
How can I think anything other than you flip your opinions around from
one message to the next. These were your
We must not have much EVT readership in PLUG...
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/106035
I just stumbled onto it
Craig
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
On Monday 07 January 2008 12:21, Erich Newell wrote:
Just a quick correction: Unless Cox has started giving away their
service, you will not be able to connect anything to their equipment
and get HD video to a recording device.
All analog channels above 23 are scrambled and all digital
There are 3 HD channels you can get on cox without using their HD box.
The channels are 12-1, 12-2, and 15-1. One of them is just a weather
channel but I have seen some decent HD shows on the others.
Technomage-hawke wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008 12:21, Erich Newell wrote:
Just a
On Monday 07 January 2008 10:12, Jay wrote:
I have dozens of servers, all of them running the most recent Debian
stable branch and pretty basic iptables instances. All are working well
except for two of them... On these two problem servers, iptables seems to
be intermittently stopping and
I do believe that they have different setups in different areas of the
valley and I know that they sometimes blow it on customer configuration.
As for HD, one would think that since the local channels are all
providing an HD signal, that these channels should just be free for
everyone to keep
On Monday 07 January 2008 12:09, Jay wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Erich Newell wrote:
1) Why do you have a service listening on this port if you intend to
block all traffic to it?
TCP/111 is listening on an internal interface (eth1) but blocked on eth0.
Lame, but RPC does not seem to have a
Shawn Badger wrote:
I found this while aimlessly surfing around and thought the group may like it:
http://www.gdruckman.com/2007/12/22/diy-paper-tux/
OK, I killed some time yesterday making one of these.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alandd/2177214382/in/pool-plug/
A bit sloppy but, now he
New Yorker, with a fairly lengthy story on Google, frightening
competitors and others wondering if they aren't getting too big and too
powerful.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/01/14/080114fa_fact_auletta
Craig
---
PLUG-discuss mailing
moin moin,
my OLPC laptop finally came in today.
I'll have it at the meeting Thu. My original plan had been something
on alternative mobile platforms such as OLPC, EEE, Nokia 770/800/N810,
OpenMoko and Android. Since my OLPC laptop was on backorder I held off a
bit.
ciao,
der.hans
--
#
Am 07. Jan, 2008 schwätzte Dazed_75 so:
It all looks like it should be of interest to someone. And much of it
I hope so :).
is to me though the items more suitable to a corporate environment are
less so for us retired folk.
I wonder how many people attend both east and west meetings
50 matches
Mail list logo
