On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 22:35 -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
That seems... unlikely. I have had thousands of unique IPs hit some of
my hosts, many to never repeat after a round of attacks. The more
plausible route is that they have a botnet of pwned boxes numbering in
the hundreds of thousands
This is the FIRST thing in setting up any secure server (along with say not
running Apache or Mysql as root, etc.)
Evidently you have not attended the HackFests, where more than a few of the
group were well, able to gain a login on a machine with various tools
including Brute Forcing via Muppet,
Here's a video using custom dictionaries and netcat:
http://bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/revision3/web/hak5/0511/hak5--0511--netcat-virtualization-wordpress--large.xvid.avi
You only see the foolish ones in your logs, these exploits can also use an
obfuscated source for a number of each of their
Hi Lisa,
I appreciate your offer to setup NFS for me, however, I don't
really want someone to just do it for me. I need to understand how to
set it up and maintain it; and the other issues are more important. I
really need someone to come over and help me resolve the remaining
IPcop, SME
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 14:12 -0700, koder wrote:
Oh, THE Ted?
There is only one ;)
Thanks for the link to the bug. Since I am not involved in development
and am never sure what constitutes a bug. I have never spent much time
in there. A feature that I don't care for is not a bug. I have not
Take a look at sshblack, it works very well for me.
http://www.pettingers.org/code/sshblack.html
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Kurt
Granroth
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 10:35
1) Today was MOTHERS DAY.
We geeky types forget the social requirements and have unrealistic
expectations of everyone, even in the PLUG.
2) It is very hard for people in this economy. They can't get to
everything, so they are very picky, attending a RHEL RHCE study group, or a
special concert
Would anyone like to start a state initiative that limits our ISPs to
managing only the bandwidth of their service as provided to users
(enforcing Network Neutrality), require that all customers must be
provided only static IP addresses, and full port ranges* - with rare
technical temporary
As it is mothers day i was not able to go to the workshop..
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Lisa Kachold lisakach...@obnosis.com wrote:
1) Today was MOTHERS DAY.
We geeky types forget the social requirements and have unrealistic
expectations of everyone, even in the PLUG.
2) It is very
Nice thought, but really, I don't think this is even viable. I'm sure the
hackers would be all for that though. Oh goody! Now 95% of the people using
cox are unprotected from everything! And the isp's responsibility would be
limited to their modem (cpe). Can't get to your email? Yeah, we
Never fear, we are on the precipice of Nationwide Wifi:
http://www.fastcompany.com/news/2008/11/4-cheap-nationwide-wifi.html
http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/007921.html
Why mandate what is already available in competition? I.E. Any free company
can now provide competition; they just
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:13 -0700, Ed wrote:
Would anyone like to start a state initiative that limits our ISPs to
managing only the bandwidth of their service as provided to users
(enforcing Network Neutrality), require that all customers must be
provided only static IP addresses, and full
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Ed wrote:
Would anyone like to start a state initiative that limits our ISPs to
managing only the bandwidth of their service as provided to users
(enforcing Network Neutrality),
require that all customers must be
provided only static IP addresses, and full port ranges* -
13 matches
Mail list logo
