Re: Test Driven Dev for CI?

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Cope
I second using Jenkins to run your tests. Eric On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Dean wrote: > If I remember correctly Cucumber will make HTTP requests to your test server. > So there's no reason you couldn't write your tests in Ruby even if the server > code is PHP.  You can use  CI serve

Re: Test Driven Dev for CI?

2012-03-12 Thread Alex Dean
If I remember correctly Cucumber will make HTTP requests to your test server. So there's no reason you couldn't write your tests in Ruby even if the server code is PHP. You can use CI server like Jenkins to run your PHPUnit tests. On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Eric Cope wrote: > I use the ligh

Re: Test Driven Dev for CI?

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Cope
I use the light weight unit test library coupled with PHPUnit's code coverage tool. If you google PHPUnit and CodeIgniter, someone already has integrated them. I've tried to use Selenium's web driver, but PHP is not an officially supported language. I never could get them to play nicely. Let m

Test Driven Dev for CI?

2012-03-12 Thread Vimal Shah
Hello all, I'm looking for an equivalent to the following RubyOnRails tools; Cucumber, Capybara and Rspec, for CodeIgnitor (CI)? Yii recommends PHPUnit and Selenium Remote Control. I don't see why these can't be used in CI? Any experience with these and/or Toast(X) for CI? I've been pushing TDD a

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Havens
I think we just found the problem! On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael Havens wrote: > hm I was going to try it both ways but when I type in 'sudo > service smb restart' the response is 'unrecognized service'. I then > checked to make sure samba was started (sudo service smb start) but

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Havens
hm I was going to try it both ways but when I type in 'sudo service smb restart' the response is 'unrecognized service'. I then checked to make sure samba was started (sudo service smb start) but got the same response. Then I made sure it was installed (apt-get install) but it is at the newest

Re: samba.conf

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Havens
cool thanks for the info On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:29 AM, James Mcphee wrote: > The standard smb.conf uses #'s to show comments and ;'s to show disabled > options. They both do the same thing in that they prevent that line from > being read from the symbol to the end of line. > > On Sun, Mar 1

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Havens
type in 'smb ports=139 445'? or w/o the 'smb'? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07 AM, James Mcphee wrote: > Add smb ports=139 445 to your smb.conf. > > On Mon Mar 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Michael Havens wrote: > >> I'll make the backup but what do I add? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Ja

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread James Mcphee
Add smb ports=139 445 to your smb.conf. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Michael Havens wrote: > I'll make the backup but what do I add? > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, James Mcphee wrote: > >> You would add it to the [global] section of the smb.conf. It's a hairy >> config to edit, s

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Havens
I'll make the backup but what do I add? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, James Mcphee wrote: > You would add it to the [global] section of the smb.conf. It's a hairy > config to edit, so be sure to run testparm on it to make sure it works > before restarting. And make backups! > > > On Sun, M

Re: attach XP computer to network fror printing

2012-03-12 Thread James Mcphee
You would add it to the [global] section of the smb.conf. It's a hairy config to edit, so be sure to run testparm on it to make sure it works before restarting. And make backups! On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > This must be text I have to add because I don't see anywhe

Re: samba.conf

2012-03-12 Thread James Mcphee
The standard smb.conf uses #'s to show comments and ;'s to show disabled options. They both do the same thing in that they prevent that line from being read from the symbol to the end of line. On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > why do they have to comment symbols? (# and ;