OT: enhanced interrogation (was: Re: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable)

2009-05-01 Thread Mike Schwartz
Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase rubber hose decryption means; in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not familiar with. ...sorta timely, since there is all kinds of ruckus going on in the

Re: OT: enhanced interrogation (was: Re: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable)

2009-05-01 Thread Joe
Yeah, that's why TrueCrypt's ability to hide the volume on a device is so awesome. The idea is, people don't realize anything is even there to BE encrypted. One thing I was reading about with regard to plausible deniability is to hide your volumes inside of other files. For example, I have a jump

Re: OT: enhanced interrogation (was: Re: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable)

2009-05-01 Thread Jim March
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mike Schwartz mike.l.schwa...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase rubber hose decryption means; in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not

Re: OT: enhanced interrogation (was: Re: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable)

2009-05-01 Thread Joe
I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS detection). The idea, more than anything, is that I can say I have no idea what the extra file

Re: OT: enhanced interrogation (was: Re: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable)

2009-05-01 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Joe wrote: I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS detection). The idea, more than anything, is that I can