Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-11 Thread kitepi...@kitepilot.com
>> One word - vpn. :) One *BETTER* word: OpenVPN ;-) ET Shawn Badger writes: > You know, I didn't even think about that. But you are right though. I could > do an SSL vpn to the box and be able to get out of the network I'm stuck in > on port 443 and not even worry about it. > > Thanks fo

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-11 Thread Shawn Badger
You know, I didn't even think about that. But you are right though. I could do an SSL vpn to the box and be able to get out of the network I'm stuck in on port 443 and not even worry about it. Thanks for the reminder On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Michael Butash wrote: > One word - vpn. :) >

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-08 Thread Michael Butash
One word - vpn. :) -mb On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 17:31 -0700, Shawn Badger wrote: > I said I only have access to port 80 and 443 out. But I really like > the idea of port knocking for most of the services. > > Hmm, I wonder if I could set up URL knocking? I will have see if I can > find a way of

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-08 Thread Shawn Badger
I said I only have access to port 80 and 443 out. But I really like the idea of port knocking for most of the services. Hmm, I wonder if I could set up URL knocking? I will have see if I can find a way of doing that to protect this app from access. On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Matt Nesteruk w

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-07 Thread Matt Nesteruk
I know you said you only want 443 open, but have you considered a port knocker to only open up ssh when you need it? -M On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Shawn Badger wrote: > As for the security on this, it is my intentions to first prevent browsing > to the page. You will have to know the URL an

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-07 Thread Shawn Badger
As for the security on this, it is my intentions to first prevent browsing to the page. You will have to know the URL and then you get a password to connect to the page. Then this will be baked by iptalbes limiting who has access to get to that URL in the first place. I know this isn't 100% effecti

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Lisa Kachold
I can offer my services to help you clean out the vermin later! If they can't protect OpenSSL based SSH, even with a layer of IPTABLES, how are you going to protect a system suid process? Laugh . On 8/6/09, Stephen wrote: > also there is a wikepedia article if you google web ssh or jsut browse

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Stephen
also there is a wikepedia article if you google web ssh or jsut browse them, they appeared to have a few options. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Shawn Badger wrote: > That is more like what I ma looking for. > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM, David Huerta wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Shawn Badger
That is more like what I ma looking for. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM, David Huerta wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Shawn Badger > wrote: > > Does any on the list know of a good web based ssh client? > > I would prefer it to run on my own system as opposed to going though one > > tha

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Shawn Badger
I know the security is going to be tough on it, but it will be locked down. That looks close to what I need short of the already done web integration (I can't code). On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:04 -0700, Shawn Badger wrote: > > Does any on the lis

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread David Huerta
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Shawn Badger wrote: > Does any on the list know of a good web based ssh client? > I would prefer it to run on my own system as opposed to going though one > that I don't have control over. > It would also be nice if it was able to pass x-windows as well all though >

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:04 -0700, Shawn Badger wrote: > Does any on the list know of a good web based ssh client? > I would prefer it to run on my own system as opposed to going though > one that I don't have control over. > It would also be nice if it was able to pass x-windows as well all > th

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Shawn Badger
ricted to using port 443 to connect to the machine so > it needs to be embedded in the browser. > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Stephen wrote: > >> I know that webmin has a web based ssh console built in, it is java >> based but not to horrible. its other

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Shawn Badger
I have played with webmin in the past, but would like did ssh and was lighter weight. As for VNC, I am restricted to using port 443 to connect to the machine so it needs to be embedded in the browser. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Stephen wrote: > I know that webmin has a web based

Re: Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Stephen
I know that webmin has a web based ssh console built in, it is java based but not to horrible. its other features are really quite nice as well. making it a very nice package for me to manage my boxes. i am not sure however of its security when exposed to the outside world. as for xwindows i

Web based ssh console

2009-08-06 Thread Shawn Badger
Does any on the list know of a good web based ssh client? I would prefer it to run on my own system as opposed to going though one that I don't have control over. It would also be nice if it was able to pass x-windows as well all though that isn't a requirement.