Re: gcc and glibc

2009-09-07 Thread Nathan England
> Hey Nathan - How'R ya? > > slamd supposedly has the fixed glibc for various types of segfaults (Xlib, > swap, modprobe) due to some of the shared libraries issues (32/64 etc.) > > http://www.slamd64.com/ > > Neither LFS or BLFS recommend that you try to build or upgrade yourself: > > A Package M

Re: gcc and glibc

2009-09-07 Thread Lisa Kachold
you want to poke it one last time: http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=th&comments_parentId=80106&forumId=1 > I'm curious, if you were to build a system from scratch, what gcc and > glibc versions would you use? > > I realize linuxfromscratch use

Re: gcc and glibc

2009-09-07 Thread kitepi...@kitepilot.com
elate to my problem instantly... What do you mean by: >> "I have recently rebuilt my systems using gcc 4.3.4 and glibc-2.10.1" Did you just slapped gcc and glibc on top of a working system? I don't believe that's gonna work... ET Nathan England writes: > > I have

gcc and glibc

2009-09-07 Thread Nathan England
to build a system from scratch, what gcc and glibc versions would you use? I realize linuxfromscratch uses gcc-4.4.1 and glibc-2.10.1 but that does not mean it is recomended as the most stable. What would you use and why, or what do you use and wh