On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Amarendra Godbole
amarendra.godb...@gmail.com wrote:
What good is efficiency when it sacrifices stability and reliability?
I find the statement to be contradictory - suggesting that Linux is
On 07/15/2011 11:54 AM, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
[...]
Most companies use OpenBSD on to secure their periphery, especially
with pf. Though there is no direct link, there is something that
suggests it: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=114780959425558 Quiet a
few OpenBSD and OpenSSH developers
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/15/2011 11:54 AM, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
[...]
Most companies use OpenBSD on to secure their periphery, especially
with pf. Though there is no direct link, there is something that
suggests it:
On 07/19/2011 01:18 PM, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Most companies and Google isn't using OpenBSD. Stop making claims you
cannot back up in the name of advocacy.
[..
Where did I make a claim? Or are you english-retard?
Oh the irony. There is no such term as english-retard.The practise
of
