http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
Just numeric illusion I suppose.
Mayuresh
___
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh mayur...@acm.org wrote:
http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
Just numeric illusion I suppose.
Why? If they contributed those many changes to the kernel, then so be
it - they deserve to counted as a contributor. It is
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:59:39PM -0600, Kaustubh Gadkari wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh mayur...@acm.org wrote:
http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
Just numeric illusion I suppose.
Why? If they contributed those many changes to the
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Mayuresh mayur...@acm.org wrote:
No problems with that. (Look I am not a stereotype MS basher.) All that I
mean is the numbers do not necessarily indicate _intent_ to contribute.
This is an interesting way of putting it. The numbers for everyone
would indicate
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Mayuresh mayur...@acm.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:59:39PM -0600, Kaustubh Gadkari wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh mayur...@acm.org wrote:
http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
Just numeric
