Re: [SlimDevices: Plugins] Multiple SqueezeSlaves?

2009-01-15 Thread ralphy
indifference_engine;384462 Wrote: Thanks. I'm sure the Squeezeslave instances will need unique MAC addresses (not a problem) and it appears the option is there for each instance to bind with a its own soundcard. The only question is can Windows cope with two soundcards or is squeezeslave's

Re: [SlimDevices: Plugins] Multiple SqueezeSlaves?

2009-01-15 Thread indifference_engine
Excellent news! I'm off to get a cheapo soundcard... The reason I asked (if anyone cares) is that in the office I've got the server running SC Squeezeslave outputting to an FM transmitter so that I can listen to my collection on an FM radio when I'm in the kitchen/bath/garden. Until now, I've

Re: [SlimDevices: Plugins] Multiple SqueezeSlaves?

2009-01-14 Thread indifference_engine
Thanks. I'm sure the Squeezeslave instances will need unique MAC addresses (not a problem) and it appears the option is there for each instance to bind with a its own soundcard. The only question is can Windows cope with two soundcards or is squeezeslave's device-id option only really useful for

[SlimDevices: Plugins] Multiple SqueezeSlaves?

2009-01-13 Thread indifference_engine
Hi, Just wondering if it's possible to install two soundcards on a pc and have two instances of squeezeslave running with each acting independantly of the other and outputting the sound to its own soundcard? Running on Windows XP is there ant performance problems in having two soundcards

Re: [SlimDevices: Plugins] Multiple SqueezeSlaves?

2009-01-13 Thread erland
I think so, the available options are shown if you run: squeezeslave -help In my installation this shows the following option: Code: -o, --output device_id: Sets the output device id. The default id is 0. The output device ids are enumerated at startup.