Re: [pmacct-discussion] Load balancing nfacctd

I would think you'd just peer every collector to every device in a full mesh, unless i'm missing something obvious. Having peering sessions going up and down constantly between the network devices and one of n collectors behind a load balancer does not seem feasible. On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:46

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Load balancing nfacctd

Right…..routers export flow to the VIP, as well as “think” they are BGPing with the VIP. The LB then has a static rule that forwards both BGP/flow to the correct collector. The goal being that if the collector IP changes for some reason, I don’t have to go touch the router configs. > On Sep

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Load balancing nfacctd

I'm not sure I follow - do you mean setting up BGP peering of the collectors to your source devices using the collector VIP as the neighbor address? On Sep 5, 2017 10:11 AM, "Paul Mabey" wrote: > Has anyone had success is pushing BGP sessions through an LB along with > netflow?

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Load balancing nfacctd

Has anyone had success is pushing BGP sessions through an LB along with netflow? Interested in the solution below but would like to have BGP aligned with netflow as well. > On Sep 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Aaron Finney wrote: > > Great to hear, nice work! > > Aaron > >