map with MPLS
labels but now in the software-defined world, potentially with
controllers, that sporadically happens too.
Paolo
On 19/3/24 05:57, Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Ok maybe I have gotten headed down the wrong path. It sounds like you’re
> saying nfacctd in normal
the tee part barebone and implement these features
in the collector? Just an idea as a perfectly valid answer could be that
performing this enrichment in the replicator then also 3rd party tools
could benefit from this info. Let me know.
Paolo
On 16/3/24 01:51, Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hi Pa
on GitHub? I'll flag it as Enhancement
right away and will be able to make progress pretty soon for the VRF ID
case.
Paolo
On 13/3/24 03:11, Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently tried creating a setup where I have an instance of nfacctd
> running that has a pretag.map that I
Hi,
I recently tried creating a setup where I have an instance of nfacctd
running that has a pretag.map that I want to look at the value of
mpls_vpn_rd as determined from the IPFIX record and then set a tag. The
plan is to then use the tee plugin to send the IPFIX traffic to a different
nfacctd
