Re: [pmacct-discussion] Sizing pmacct server

2012-10-09 Thread Tony
help people to point out what you might change ? regards, Tony. From: John Center john.cen...@villanova.edu To: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] Sizing pmacct server Hi Tony

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Sizing pmacct server

2012-10-04 Thread Tony
Hi John, How are you aggregating/summarising your data ? What is the traffic throughput on your 6500 ?  What is the volume of data you are seeing ? How big/quickly is your DB growing ? regards, Tony. From: John Center john.cen...@villanova.edu To: pmacct

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-29 Thread Tony
the netflow packets or is able to write them twice as I don't want to mess with real data at this point. regards, Tony. --- On Thu, 30/12/10, Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net wrote: From: Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data To: Tony

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-28 Thread Tony
? At this point everything appears to be back to normal with the 64-bit counters. Thanks for the pointer in the right direction. regards, Tony. --- On Fri, 24/12/10, Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net wrote: From: Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-23 Thread Tony
-12-23 18:00:01 | | 0.2496 | 2010-12-23 16:00:00 | 2010-12-23 17:00:01 | | 0.1036 | 2010-12-23 15:00:00 | 2010-12-23 16:00:01 | +-+-+-+ 19 rows in set (0.00 sec) Any ideas ? Thanks, Tony. --- On Thu, 23/12/10, Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net

[pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-22 Thread Tony
don't think the problem is on the Cisco side (although I'm happy to investigate this further if anyone can point in the right direction). Thanks, Tony. ___ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-22 Thread Tony
table Running 12.2(33)SRD4 Advanced IP Services on the 7609 if it matters. regards, Tony. --- On Thu, 23/12/10, James Cornman ja...@atlanticmetro.net wrote: From: James Cornman ja...@atlanticmetro.net Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data To: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net

[pmacct-discussion] Traffic on Linux Bridge

2010-06-22 Thread Tony Zakula
to for record keeping. Will pmacct capture the traffic per ipAddress on that bridge? Thank for any help. Tony Z ___ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Re: [pmacct-discussion] reloading config accuracy

2009-09-24 Thread Tony
Hi, Replying to myself, but it's only when you start talking to yourself that it's an issue, right ? RIGHT ? --- On Tue, 22/9/09, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote: --snip-- I've upgraded to the latest 12.0rc2 version and the results are a lot better. An example of the data is: --snip

Re: [pmacct-discussion] reloading config accuracy

2009-09-21 Thread Tony
Hi Paolo, --- On Mon, 7/9/09, Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net wrote: From: Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] reloading config accuracy To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net Received: Monday, 7 September, 2009, 2:28 AM Hi Tony, On Sat

Re: [pmacct-discussion] reloading config accuracy

2009-09-05 Thread Tony
reported by the packeteer. Thanks for your assistance, I'll report back in a week/month or two with the results of the testing with adjusted data. regards, Tony. __ Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7