Re: [pmacct-discussion] bgp_daemon wrong next-hop

[Alberto Santos]

Hi Paolo, I want to help with this, I was quite busy in jan, but now I have
the setup almost ready.
I just need to install pmacct in the VM where we will have the BGP peering,
looks like the same issue I reported before.

BR
Al



Alberto Santos CCIE #26648
JNCIS-SP
*"...Fix your DNS, make it dual-stack, take your mail server and make it
dual-stack, take your web server and make it dual-stack..." by Randy
Bush/RIPE IPv6*

On 17 February 2017 at 16:10, Paolo Lucente <pa...@pmacct.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Catalin,
>
>
> Any chance we can go unicast and arrange a way for me to troubleshoot
> this? Like either you point the BGP session towards one of my boxes or
> you can grant me temporary access to your environment? Happy to support
> you.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:53:25PM +, Catalin Petrescu wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently i have only type 0 and i can see in the logs the correct
> > > next-hop:
> >
> >
> > mistake form my side , the next hop is still not correct but has changed
> to
> > another randon ip.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Catalin
>
> > ___
> > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>
>
> ___
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Re: [pmacct-discussion] bgp_daemon wrong next-hop

[Alberto Santos]

no problem, were you able to find something?


cheers


Alberto Santos CCIE #26648
JNCIS-SP
*"...Fix your DNS, make it dual-stack, take your mail server and make it
dual-stack, take your web server and make it dual-stack..." by Randy
Bush/RIPE IPv6*

On 25 February 2017 at 13:39, Paolo Lucente <pa...@pmacct.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Alberto,
>
> Thanks very much for that. Catalin has been gracious enough to provide
> access to his environment (on which i should make progress very soon). I
> believe you two are bumping into the very same issue (MPLS VPN routes,
> same BGP next-hop also). I should be able to look into it during this.
> Let me include you in any (troubleshooting, debugging) conversation and
> then we can summarise all back on the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Paolo
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:00:36AM +0100, Alberto Santos wrote:
> > Hi Paolo, I want to help with this, I was quite busy in jan, but now I
> have
> > the setup almost ready.
> > I just need to install pmacct in the VM where we will have the BGP
> peering,
> > looks like the same issue I reported before.
> >
> > BR
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> > Alberto Santos CCIE #26648
> > JNCIS-SP
> > *"...Fix your DNS, make it dual-stack, take your mail server and make it
> > dual-stack, take your web server and make it dual-stack..." by Randy
> > Bush/RIPE IPv6*
> >
> > On 17 February 2017 at 16:10, Paolo Lucente <pa...@pmacct.net> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Catalin,
> > >
> > >
> > > Any chance we can go unicast and arrange a way for me to troubleshoot
> > > this? Like either you point the BGP session towards one of my boxes or
> > > you can grant me temporary access to your environment? Happy to support
> > > you.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Paolo
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:53:25PM +, Catalin Petrescu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently i have only type 0 and i can see in the logs the correct
> > > > > next-hop:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > mistake form my side , the next hop is still not correct but has
> changed
> > > to
> > > > another randon ip.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Catalin
> > >
> > > > ___
> > > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> > >
>
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

[pmacct-discussion] route distinguisher (RD) looks wired when dump the BGP table.

[Alberto Santos]

Hi,

I started playing with pmacct and I noticed that the route distinguisher RD
looks wired when dumping the BGP table in a file. Is there any reason why?

here it is an example:

"rd": "1:40.0.17.10:256

The IP address is inverted, it should be 10.17.0.40 and the 2nd part should
be 1806 instead.
Is this a bug? pls find below the complete output from the file.

[root@hostname]# cat bgp-10_197_1_114-2016_11_29T20_05_00.txt | grep
10.12.95.16
{"timestamp": "2016-11-29 20:05:00", "peer_ip_src": "10.17.1.14",
"event_type": "dump", "ip_prefix": "10.12.95.16/28", "bgp_nexthop":
"10.17.1.14", "as_path": "65346", "comms": "65346:39", "ecomms":
"RT:65432:2", "origin": 0, "local_pref": 100, "rd": "1:40.0.17.10:256"}

BR

Alberto
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists