Da: pmacct-discussion per conto di Paolo
Lucente
Inviato: lunedì 14 novembre 2016 18.02.19
A: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net
Oggetto: Re: [pmacct-discussion] Redis support
Hi Lorenzo,
You are the second person asking for this - i'd be curious to see on the
list if there would be anybody
On 14/11/2016 19:42, Rasto Rickardt wrote:
Hello Paolo,
+1 for me, main reasons are the usual Redis ones:
Pmacct have already a lot of backend plugins, but if another is needed I
vote for redis. Redis is blazing fast and can act both as a message
queue and a an ephemeral storage. I think
Hello Paolo,
+1 for me, main reasons are the usual Redis ones:
Speed - 100k GET by_id per second
Data persistence across restarts
Multi node deployment is not a MUST like other NoSQL document stores
Lightweight
My use-case is storing time-based events from flows in InfluxDB (bps,
pps, flows per
Hi Lorenzo,
You are the second person asking for this - i'd be curious to see on the
list if there would be anybody else interested in this.
I have a question, maybe basic: would not Kafka or RabbitMQ be integrated
the same way with Logstash and/or Telegraf?
Cheers,
Paolo
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016
Hi Paolo,
I'm writing to asking if you are thinking about supporting Redis as plugin
The advantage to use Redis would be that both Logstash both Telegraf support it
in a native way, then it would be easy to store pmacct data in native way in
Elasticsearch or InfluxDB.
Regards
digitel
Via dell
