Re: [pmacct-discussion] pmacct and long flows

2016-04-19 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Michael,

It principle it sounds no problem, you can set those directives even up to
one year. I just wonder whether that would make sense, ie. wait for a long
flow to complete before account for it. But maybe a better explanation of
your use-case and/or what you would like to achieve (ie. what you would like
to see logged in a database) would help to be more precise at my end. Feel
free to ping me unicast if you prefer.

Cheers,
Paolo

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:00:31AM +0100, Michael Silas wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We're currently thinking about whether pmacct is the right tool on our
> network./We often have fairly long flows that can last upwards of a hour on
> our network, and were wondering whether pmacct will be able to aggregate these
> type of flows. I can see the options amqp_history, and amqp_refresh_time in
> our config file - can these values bet set fairly high and will they aggregate
> flows that typically go on for a long time?
> 
>   Many thanks
> 
> ___
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


[pmacct-discussion] pmacct and long flows

2016-04-18 Thread Michael Silas
Hello,

We're currently thinking about whether pmacct is the right tool on our
network./We often have fairly long flows that can last upwards of a hour on
our network, and were wondering whether pmacct will be able to aggregate these
type of flows. I can see the options amqp_history, and amqp_refresh_time in
our config file - can these values bet set fairly high and will they aggregate
flows that typically go on for a long time?

  Many thanks

___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists