___
Da: pmacct-discussion <pmacct-discussion-boun...@pmacct.net> per conto di Paolo
Lucente <pa...@pmacct.net>
Inviato: lunedì 14 novembre 2016 18.02.19
A: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net
Oggetto: Re: [pmacct-discussion] Redis support
Hi Lorenzo,
You are the second person asking for thi
On 14/11/2016 19:42, Rasto Rickardt wrote:
Hello Paolo,
+1 for me, main reasons are the usual Redis ones:
Pmacct have already a lot of backend plugins, but if another is needed I
vote for redis. Redis is blazing fast and can act both as a message
queue and a an ephemeral storage. I think
Hello Paolo,
+1 for me, main reasons are the usual Redis ones:
Speed - 100k GET by_id per second
Data persistence across restarts
Multi node deployment is not a MUST like other NoSQL document stores
Lightweight
My use-case is storing time-based events from flows in InfluxDB (bps,
pps, flows per
