Thanks Paolo,
The class field was showing up as "unknown" for me, but by using
aggregate_primitive I was indeed able to extract the field I need
(#95). Cool stuff!
Cheers,
Yann
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Paolo Lucente wrote:
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> You should use the 'class' aggregation primiti
Hi Yann,
You should use the 'class' aggregation primitive for that - or are you
already doing so ant it's not working? To your other question: yes, you
can extend, within some limits, the set of natively supported primitives
with custom ones: please look at the aggregate_primitives framework (in