Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Jaroslav, Unfortunately not as they are integral part of the sql_history feature (which you need to populate the time-related variables of the tables). As an alternative, only for the 'all' tables where you have the other timestamps, you may disable sql_history and write to a fixed, say, 'rout

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted rollover time config?

2006-11-17 Thread Alan
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:45:41AM +, Paolo Lucente wrote: > Hi Alan, > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:02:01AM -0800, Alan wrote: > > Hey all. I have 2 systems running pmacctd with virtually identical > > versions and setups, but on one system the stamp_inserted is inserted at > > 23:00:00 and

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted rollover time config?

2006-11-17 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Alan, On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:02:01AM -0800, Alan wrote: > Hey all. I have 2 systems running pmacctd with virtually identical > versions and setups, but on one system the stamp_inserted is inserted at > 23:00:00 and the other is at 00:00:00. The two systems are supposed to > be able to bac

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-16 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hello Jamie, On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:07:33PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > Actually, I'm still not clear: the FAQ suggests that only sql_history is > required, though sql_history_roundoff is advised. Is that true? True. sql_history writes the stamp fields; sql_history_roundoff enables the

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-16 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Paolo Lucente wrote: >On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:14:00AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >> Ok. Does this mean that unless the config options 'sql_history' and >> 'sql_history_roundoff' exist, then pmacctd will not write time stamps to the >> database? > >yes. Actuall

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-13 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Paolo Lucente wrote: >On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:14:00AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >> Ok. Does this mean that unless the config options 'sql_history' and >> 'sql_history_roundoff' exist, then pmacctd will not write time stamps to the >> database? > >yes. Thanks

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-12 Thread Paolo Lucente
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:14:00AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > Ok. Does this mean that unless the config options 'sql_history' and > 'sql_history_roundoff' exist, then pmacctd will not write time stamps to the > database? yes. > I've done so, but I've also added these two config options bac

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-12 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Paolo Lucente wrote: >Hello Jamie, > >On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:01:51PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >> Is it true that stamp_inserted and stamp_updated don't get touched unless >> sql_history and sql_history_roundoff are also set? If so, when did this >> change? > >

Re: [pmacct-discussion] stamp_inserted and sql_history

2005-08-12 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hello Jamie, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:01:51PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > Is it true that stamp_inserted and stamp_updated don't get touched unless > sql_history and sql_history_roundoff are also set? If so, when did this > change? Absolutely true. > I was running 0.7.4 for a while and I