[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-25 Thread Silke Reimer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:22:40PM +0100, Armin Burger wrote: > > >> Silke Reimer wrote: > > > > > Yes, you are right. BTW: We already contacted you last summer > > (before this list existed) but never got an answer. Please don't > > misunderstand: This is not an offence since I know the problem

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-24 Thread Armin Burger
>> Silke Reimer wrote: > > Yes, you are right. BTW: We already contacted you last summer > (before this list existed) but never got an answer. Please don't > misunderstand: This is not an offence since I know the problem of > getting to many emails! It is just an explanation why we contact you >

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-24 Thread Silke Reimer
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Armin Burger wrote: > Silke, > > I wanted to answer your 2 mails in one, but it began to become a huge > mail, so I split it up... This has been the reason why I did sent two emails as well. > > > Silke Reimer wrote: > > > >During the projects we had

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-23 Thread Armin Burger
Silke, I wanted to answer your 2 mails in one, but it began to become a huge mail, so I split it up... Silke Reimer wrote: > > During the projects we had to enhance p.mapper in some directions > and I would like to give them back to p.mapper as far as this is > possible and useful. Right now I

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-23 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
Il 18:26, luned? 23 gennaio 2006, Armin Burger ha scritto: > I will probably define a function like '_p()' that is used in the code > instead of '_()' to do all the translation of annotations etc. You can > then either use the supplied internal function of p.mapper or map it to > the gettext _() fu

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-23 Thread Armin Burger
I will probably define a function like '_p()' that is used in the code instead of '_()' to do all the translation of annotations etc. You can then either use the supplied internal function of p.mapper or map it to the gettext _() function like function _p($string) { return _($string); } I

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-23 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
Il 16:20, luned? 23 gennaio 2006, Silke Reimer ha scritto: > Hi Armin and all the other p.mapper users, > > I18N: > - full support for gettext instead of the p.mapper internal way to > define text strings. > This would be great! I really hope Armin will accept this contribution. I use gettext

[Pmapper-users] Possible contributions

2006-01-23 Thread Silke Reimer
Hi Armin and all the other p.mapper users, first of all many thanks for this great piece of software. We used p.mapper in several client projects in the last year and our clients are very happy with it. During the projects we had to enhance p.mapper in some directions and I would like to give th