Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-31 Thread Jeff McKenna
If someone from the pmapper community creates a pmapper5 package for MS4W (including full demo data, with no errors, etc.), then sends it to me, I can easily add it into MS4W. Otherwise I will continue to share the 4.4.0 MS4W package that Armin provided. -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Cons

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-31 Thread Solly Vuso
Thank you Jeff for adding it and I hope the error can be fixed. I also agree with the suggestion of including pmapper 5 features to this version On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:40 AM, gioza wrote: > In my opinion pmapper5 should be included in ms4w. > I think Pmapper4.4 is a robust and mature product

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-30 Thread gioza
In my opinion pmapper5 should be included in ms4w. I think Pmapper4.4 is a robust and mature product but Pmapper5 is the right way for webgis. Faster, more flexible and even if OL2.12 is no more developed, at the moment, it is still competitive as library and robust -- View this message in conte

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-30 Thread Jeff McKenna
Version 4.4.0 is now available in MS4W (http://ms4w.com), and its setup.exe installer will also change necessary mapfile paths etc. Note that I did make one change to the package mentioned by Armin: I changed references of version "3.4" to "4.4.0" in /config/common/._startup_/.defaults.xml Als

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-30 Thread Solly Vuso
Thank you Armin I have not tested this version but I just want to check if it does have an option of openlayers plugin? On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > Yes OL 3 has been getting lots of love, and I've heard many are coming > back from Leaflet to OpenLayers again. -jeff >

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-29 Thread Jeff McKenna
Yes OL 3 has been getting lots of love, and I've heard many are coming back from Leaflet to OpenLayers again. -jeff On 2016-05-29 4:21 PM, gioza wrote: > Hi Armin actually openlayers project has moved to 3.x release and it seems > well supported. Ol 2.12 which is implemented in pmapper5 is no

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-29 Thread gioza
Hi Armin actually openlayers project has moved to 3.x release and it seems well supported. Ol 2.12 which is implemented in pmapper5 is no more developed, and its libraries are really different from 3.x Let us know your intentions. Thanks GIovanni -- View this message in context: http://pmapper-

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-29 Thread Jeff McKenna
Thanks Armin, I will try that version now. -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ On 2016-05-29 11:53 AM, Armin Burger wrote: > You can also use the latest MS4W package from here > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pmapper/files/p.ma

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-29 Thread Armin Burger
You can also use the latest MS4W package from here https://sourceforge.net/projects/pmapper/files/p.mapper%204/4.4.0/ It's based on the svn export of the latest p.mapper 4 with fixes and new plugins from Thomas Raffin. I haven't tried if it works since I have no Windows PHP installation any mo

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-27 Thread gioza
Hi, I think it's the right version! Armin and others made a lot of improvements (tiling, caching, ol 2.12 integration...) -- View this message in context: http://pmapper-users-p-mapper-users-mailing-list.993774.n3.nabble.com/pmapper-project-tp4025880p4025884.html Sent from the pmapper-users --

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-27 Thread Jeff McKenna
Great timing, I am packaging pmapper5 now for MS4W users (on http://ms4w.com). Should I be grabbing it from SVN? http://svn.pmapper.net/repos/pmapper/trunk/pmapper5/ -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ On 2016-05-27 10:19 AM, g

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-27 Thread gioza
i'm testing pmapper5 with ms4w 3.1.4 (mapserver 7.0.1), it works well -- View this message in context: http://pmapper-users-p-mapper-users-mailing-list.993774.n3.nabble.com/pmapper-project-tp4025880p4025882.html Sent from the pmapper-users -- p.mapper users mailing list mailing list archive at

Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-27 Thread gioza
i'm really interested as well. I think one "ticket" should be the responsive layout because pmapper5 is excellent with the ol integration but not suitable to mobile devices. -- View this message in context: http://pmapper-users-p-mapper-users-mailing-list.993774.n3.nabble.com/pmapper-project-t

[pmapper-users] pmapper project

2016-05-27 Thread jose mvm
hi Armin Burger, please, can you tell us (all users) what do you thing about pmapper project - the present and the future of the project? thanks best regards -- View this message in context: http://pmapper-users-p-mapper-users-mailing-list.993774.n3.nabble.com/pmapper-project-tp4025880.html S