Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

On 02/19/2018 04:39 PM, Neil Herber (nospam) wrote: There may already be some pages that cover this topic. They could be brought up to date. It surprised me to find out that I am credited as the maintainer of one! http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/DiscussionTab

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

There may already be some pages that cover this topic. They could be brought up to date. It surprised me to find out that I am credited as the maintainer of one! http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/DiscussionTab http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SimpleDiscussLink Neil On 2018-02-18 12:53

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Hi, On 18.02.2018 08:58, Dominique Faure wrote: > > IMHO, these practises are good candidates as Cookbook recipes. Nobody > say that recipes should always provide a bunch of php/js/ scripts. > This is why the Cookbook category "Markup Only" exists (http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/MarkupOnly).

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

If I remember correctly, there are Skins like the Wikimedia style skins that already have conditionals for whether or not Talk pages exist on them. Creating a talk page is as easy as inviting folk to create it with a Talk? link on anything but a -Talk page. Crisses > On Feb 18, 2018, at

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Hi, IMHO, these practises are good candidates as Cookbook recipes. Nobody say that recipes should always provide a bunch of php/js/ scripts. Regards On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Christopher Cox wrote: > On 02/17/2018 08:47 PM, Chuck Dee wrote: > >> Perhaps there needs

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

On 02/17/2018 08:47 PM, Chuck Dee wrote: Perhaps there needs to be another category of modifications other than recipes that covers this level of complexity. I've seen other modifications that require modification to code in several locations that I haven't thought were recipes, but that's what

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Perhaps there needs to be another category of modifications other than recipes that covers this level of complexity. I've seen other modifications that require modification to code in several locations that I haven't thought were recipes, but that's what they're called. On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

On 02/15/2018 11:31 PM, Jim Syler wrote: Something like this would be really great. I’m looking over your suggestions and the various [recipes](http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Category/Comments) for doing this, and none of them seem like the sort of easy drop-in solution I’m hoping for. On Feb 15,

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Something like this would be really great. I’m looking over your suggestions and the various [recipes](http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Category/Comments ) for doing this, and none of them seem like the sort of easy drop-in solution I’m hoping for. > On

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

On 15/02/2018 19:09, Dominique Faure wrote: In PmWiki, Talk pages are strictly regular pages. Its up to you to setup some kind of binding (usually a link) between a specific page and another talk-related one. Group headers/footers (http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/GroupHeaders) are

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Aha. I see. Perhaps something in the documentation to that effect would be a good idea? Thanks. > On Feb 15, 2018, at 12:09 PM, Dominique Faure > wrote: > > Hi, > > In PmWiki, Talk pages are strictly regular pages. > > Its up to you to setup some kind of binding

Re: [pmwiki-users] Talk Pages

Hi, In PmWiki, Talk pages are strictly regular pages. Its up to you to setup some kind of binding (usually a link) between a specific page and another talk-related one. Group headers/footers (http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/GroupHeaders) are convenient places where to insert such links. On

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

If you end the link to the comments page with ?action=edit then the user who doesn't have edit permission will be prompted for a password even if the page doesn't exist. At least that's what happens on my system, which uses AuthUser. Randy On Feb 4, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Sameer Kumar wrote:

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

snip I'm also testing out the same Comments page system Sameer is using, and also as a page action. Seems to work well, but one big problem is that a user who has not already entered the password for editing (for which they get a prompt if editing an existing page) are confronted with ... The

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

I'm also testing out the same Comments page system Sameer is using, and also as a page action. Seems to work well, but one big problem is that a user who has not already entered the password for editing (for which they get a prompt if editing an existing page) are confronted with ... The page

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

On Jan 30, 2008 4:58 PM, Hans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For talk-page linking see http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SimpleDiscussLink That's the one I am trying out-- any hints on how to integrate it into the skin rather than as a page content item would be appreciated... I'm not clear on how

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

On Jan 30, 2008 4:58 PM, Hans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For talk-page linking see http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SimpleDiscussLink That's the one I am trying out-- any hints on how to integrate it into the skin rather than as a page content item would be appreciated... I'm not

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

On Jan 30, 2008 4:58 PM, Hans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For talk-page linking see http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SimpleDiscussLink That's the one I am trying out-- any hints on how to integrate it into the skin rather than as a page content item would be appreciated... I'm not

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

Chris Lott chris.lott at gmail.com writes: There are a plethora of comment page recipes, some maintained and some not, some conflicting and some not. All I am looking for is something that will allow me to implement discussion pages that are as simple and similar to Wikipedia style talk

Re: [pmwiki-users] talk pages

Thursday, January 31, 2008, 1:41:40 AM, imoc wrote: I use 'CommentBoxPlus' recipe. It's easy to install and set up. Only that it write comments into the same page, so there's no tab or link. It looks just like normal blog comment. Commentboxplus can write to a different page. See its