Re: What to do about L and L<"Foo Bar">

Hi Karl See below. On 29/05/18 13:49, Karl Williamson wrote: podspec says this: Previous versions of perlpod allowed for a "L" syntax (as in "L"), which was not easily distinguishable from "L" syntax and for "L<"section">" which was only slightly less ambiguous. This syntax is no longer in

Re: Bug #98326 for Pod-Checker: Can we make “A non-empty Z<>” a warning and not an error

On 05/22/2018 07:18 PM, Dan Muey wrote: Greetings! Per Karl Williamson’s request[1] before he makes any changes we’d like to run the idea past you all and get your feedback: http://perldoc.perl.org/perlpodspec.html says about Z<>: “This code is unusual is that it should have no content. That

What to do about L and L<"Foo Bar">

podspec says this: Previous versions of perlpod allowed for a "L" syntax (as in "L"), which was not easily distinguishable from "L" syntax and for "L<"section">" which was only slightly less ambiguous. This syntax is no longer in the specification, and has been replaced by the "L" syntax (where