Re: Discussing Extending the POD Spec

2023-09-23 Thread Ron Savage

Hi All

While you make many valid points, there is a bit of a lack of a broader 
vision, crippled perhaps by an over-commitment to text mode.


This problem has been solved with the advent of the TiddlyWiki, which 
use WikiText.


They use CamelCase a lot. A CamelCase word is automatically linked 
within a single TiddlyWiki by the inbuilt editor to another point within 
the text. Hence the MainMenu I use in every TiddlyWiki uses CamelCase.


And yes, they are best viewed with a web client (browser).

See tiddlywiki.com. Downloads are free.

Search there for WikiText for more. The homepage is of course a 
TiddlyWiki.


Note also the broad ecosystem surrounding TiddlyWikis.

Here is one of mine: http://savage.net.au/misc/symbolic.language.html

It's a download accompanying a TV script I'm preparing to submit to ABC 
TV here in Melbourne Victoria.


Click on the MainMenu item TiddlyWikis for more about the TiddlyWiki 
concept, especially about the fact that the inbuilt edit has a little 
command language and can generate HTML for you.


I keep a directory full of these, one per project.

---
Cheers
Ron
savage.net.au


Re: What to do about L and L<"Foo Bar">

2018-05-28 Thread Ron Savage

Hi Karl

See below.

On 29/05/18 13:49, Karl Williamson wrote:

podspec says this:

Previous versions of perlpod allowed for a "L" syntax (as in
"L"), which was not easily distinguishable from
"L" syntax and for "L<"section">" which was only slightly less
ambiguous. This syntax is no longer in the specification, and has been
replaced by the "L" syntax (where the slash was formerly
optional). Pod parsers should tolerate the "L<"section">" syntax, for
a while at least. The suggested heuristic for distinguishing
L" from "L" is that if it contains any whitespace,
it's a section. Pod processors should warn about this being deprecated
syntax.

Pod:Simple accepts these without complaint.

If I change things to complain, a bunch of things in the perl core are 
found to be in violation, even of the deprecated syntax.


The question is what to do?

1) We could leave things as they always have been, to let sleeping dogs 
lie.  It's worked for so long that we're not seriously going to stop 
accepting these.


This pretends things have not changed when in fact they have, so not my 
preference.



2) Raise the warnings, either on both cases or just the deprecated


Raise warnings on deprecated structures, so uses can fix problems, is my 
choice here.


3) Don't raise warnings, but change Pod::Checker to do so, under the 
theory that you won't be using that unless you want to know the iffy 
things.  Maybe make the deprecated come out always, and the tolerated 
only for level 2 warnings.


This imposes a burden on users. Tasks: (a) Change to Pod::Checker, to 
find problems; (b) Fix problems. Not my preference since it's simpler 
for the end user to find the same problems under (2).



I'm leaning towards option 3).


--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: raw_data with Pod::Simple::PullParser

2017-03-29 Thread Ron Savage

Hi Francois

Do what works. If you're only parsing your own POD, then what you're 
doing now should be OK.


I would like (one day!) to write a BNF for POD and use Marpa:

http://savage.net.au/Marpa.html

About 10 of the Perl packages there are mine.

If you intend to create a module fit for CPAN, then of course it's a 
bigger decision as to the internal structure of your code.


On 29/03/17 17:09, RAPPAZ Francois via pod-people wrote:

Hi Ron,

Thanks for the suggestion.

At the end, reading the pod file and capturing the key from head1 is easy 
(below).  I could use a Pod::Simple::SimpleTree  , but I would still to have 
the output as raw pod. Probably using a parser to select pars of pod is not a 
good idea ?

François

my $fname = shift;
 my $mod;
open $mod, "<$fname" or die "Can't open $fname $! \n";
my %data;
my $data_ar;
my $key;
my $ispod;
for my $line (<$mod>) {
chomp $line;
if ( $line =~ /^=cut/ ) { $ispod = 0; }
if ( $line =~ /^=head1\s*(.+)$/i ) {
$ispod = 1;
if ($key) {#$key read from the previous =head1
$data{$key} = $data_ar;#store the array of lines as an 
array ref
$data_ar = undef;  # and prepare a new array
}
$key = $1; #now fetch the new value for $key
}
push @{$data_ar}, $line  if ($ispod) ;#store the line in the array 
if we are in a pod section

}
close $mod;
$data{$key} = $data_ar;#fetch the lines from the last =head1 read
=for comment
for $key ( keys %data ) {
print "*$key*\n";
print join( "\n", @{ $data{$key} } ), "\n";

}
=cut
    return %data;

-Original Message-
From: Ron Savage [mailto:r...@savage.net.au]
Sent: 28 March 2017 23:36
To: pod-people@perl.org
Subject: Re: raw_data with Pod::Simple::PullParser

Hi François

Can't help specifically but I do suggest you use a tree rather than a hash. It 
just makes much more sense to me to store the pod that way.

--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au



--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: raw_data with Pod::Simple::PullParser

2017-03-28 Thread Ron Savage

Hi François

Can't help specifically but I do suggest you use a tree rather than a 
hash. It just makes much more sense to me to store the pod that way.


--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-13 Thread Ron Savage

Hi David

On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:

On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson <pub...@khwilliamson.com> wrote:



Like John, I don’t much care. I agree that Pod::Simple::Pod lacks necessary 
information. ExtractPod seems fine to me. Uh, though there is this:

perldoc [-h] [-D] [-t] [-u] [-m] [-l] [-F]
 [-i] [-V] [-T] [-r]
 [-d destination_file]
 [-o formatname]
 [-M FormatterClassName]
 [-w formatteroption:value]
 [-n nroff-replacement]
 [-X]
 [-L language_code]
 PageName|ModuleName|ProgramName|URL

So the formatter arg to -M would be:

 perldoc -M ExtractPod

Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat?


So make it -J JustPod, or is that parameter list sacrosanct?

Perhaps leave -M, and add -J, which defaults to a value of JustPod.

--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-11 Thread Ron Savage

Hi

On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:

On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson <pub...@khwilliamson.com> wrote:



Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat?


Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod.

--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: Pod::Simple - August PR Challenge Assignment

2015-08-19 Thread Ron Savage

Hi Sean

On 19/08/15 00:58, Sean Zellmer wrote:

Hey all,

I was assigned Pod::Simple as my August module for the PR Challenge
http://cpan-prc.org/ and was wondering if anything jumps to mind as a
project for my PR. Any ideas are welcome. :)


Info I've collected in my TiddlyWiki for Perl:

o Useful modules:
- Pod::Simple
- Provides Pod::Simple::LinkSection and Pod::Simple::BlackBox
- Pod::Text uses Pod::Simple
- Pod::Usage
- Pod::Perldoc::ToPod
- Text::Unidecode
- Pod::Escapes
- Pod::HTML2Pod
- Pod::PXML uses Pod::Tree

o Problems:
- Recognition of POD commands with binary data. See these 2:
- 
https://github.com/theory/pod-simple/blob/master/lib/Pod/Simple/BlackBox.pm#L243
- 
https://github.com/theory/pod-simple/blob/master/lib/Pod/Simple/BlackBox.pm#L158

- ASCII 'v' Unicode 'v' CP1252. See
- http://www.mail-archive.com/pod-people@perl.org/msg01710.html

o Links:
- https://metacpan.org/pod/perlpodspec
- http://www.mail-archive.com/pod-people@perl.org/index.html#01700
- http://perldoc.perl.org/perlpod.html
- 
https://github.com/theory/pod-simple/blob/master/lib/Pod/Simple/BlackBox.pm#L243
- 
https://github.com/genehack/pod-simple/blob/add-pod-simple-pod/lib/Pod/Simple.pm

- https://492648.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=364130
- https://github.com/genehack/pod-simple-pod

o Obsolete modules:
- Pod::Parser
- Pod::Checker depends on Pod::Parser
- Pod::POM

--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au


Re: Pod::Spell new maintainer

2015-05-12 Thread Ron Savage

Hi Olivier

Welcome aboard The Good Ship Pod.

On 12/05/15 22:02, Olivier Mengué wrote:

Hi POD people,

I'm new on the mailing list, so here is just a mail to introduce myself.

After Caleb left CPAN, I just asked Allison Randal to give me co-maint
on Pod::Spell and that is now effective.

To introduce myself, I have already a few distributions on CPAN and I'm
a member of the Perl Toolchain Gang.
I have already patched about 200 distributions on CPAN (rough count of
my GitHub forks).

I also have some work in progress on Test::Pod::No404s.

Olivier.




--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au