[Podofo-users] Unsupported pdf fonts using PoDoFo

2015-11-29 Thread Ulagan Asokan
Hi, While processing the PDF files using podofo, the fonts mentioned below are not supported. 1. MS Mincho 2. MS Gothic 3. MingLiU-EXTB 4. MingLiU 5. Meiryo 6. Gulim 7. Batang 8. Cambria Podofo returns the error message "This font format Is

Re: [Podofo-users] Prohibit instantiation of factories (all methods static)

2015-11-29 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hi zyx, I couldn't really find it right now searching the Web, but AFAIK this is a known idiom (short of making a class with only static methods a namespace instead, which I've found as a recommendation, but which I think is too radical and would probably wreak havoc with the doxygen-generated doc

Re: [Podofo-users] Solving my cmake 3.2 build problems

2015-11-29 Thread zyx
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 00:00 +, Matthew Brincke wrote: > a patch for that mentioned in the subject > is attached to this e-mail. Hi, good catches. I committed it as revision 1697: http://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/code/1697 Bye, zyx -- http://www.litePDF.cz

Re: [Podofo-users] MinGW-w64 cross-build problem: windres not taking compiler options

2015-11-29 Thread zyx
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 19:10 +, Matthew Brincke wrote: > please also change WS2_32 in the top-level CMakeLists.txt > to ws2_32 so that cross-compiling the shared library and > the programs with MinGW-w64 on GNU/Linux works. Then I'm > indeed fine with your changes to my patch if there isn't > an

Re: [Podofo-users] Prohibit instantiation of factories (all methods static)

2015-11-29 Thread zyx
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 23:41 +, Matthew Brincke wrote: > a patch for that mentioned in the subject > is attached to this e-mail. Hi, what am I missing here? Those are just default constructors, created by the compiler; except of the one added to the private sections. The other odd thing

Re: [Podofo-users] Bug in GetMultiLineTextAsLines

2015-11-29 Thread zyx
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:06 +, Matthew Brincke wrote: > even though I'm not Christian Sakowski, I can do that conversion to > a patch too, right ;-) ? Hi, thanks Matthew, I committed Christian's change as revision 1695: http://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/code/1695 I hope it's understood