Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread Pietro Paolini
Hi Matthew, I resorted to the shared-library solution as it worked well for me, at least it builds. I haven't tried to run anything as yet. For the sake of my personal understanding On 13/08/2019 13:40, Matthew Brincke wrote: Then podofo was automatically configured with JPEG support and

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread zyx
On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the > project. Hi, are you sure of that? See:

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hello zyx, hello all, > On 14 August 2019 at 08:59 zyx wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with > > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the > > project. > >

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread zyx
On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 13:24 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > What do you think about calling such a package > a "hidden optional dependency"? Hi, I agree it's kind of hidden, having it mentioned in the README isn't enough to make it better visible (as proved here). Would the terminology