A nested list under poe@ to aggregate poe-questions@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:46:19PM -0500, Rocco Caputo wrote:
> The heavy development discussions may be scaring people off. Is it
> time to split the list into development and questions tracks?
>
> Proposed options (r
The heavy development discussions may be scaring people off. Is it
time to split the list into development and questions tracks?
Proposed options (revise and amend as necessary):
1. No. It's too early to tell.
2. Yes.
a. Move the help/questions to some other list. Perhaps
poe-questi
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:44:28AM -0800, Exide Arabellan wrote:
> Im working on a module that utilizes POE::Component::Server::TCP. Being
> the neat freak that i am, im inclined to name the module
> POE::Component::Server::TCP::MUD, though it seems rather cumbersome.
> I've seen other modules (
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:19:10AM -0500, sungo wrote:
> On (02/07 15:22), Rocco Caputo wrote:
>
> > Signal reform is not quite done. We're still dispatching _signal,
> > albeit with great reluctance.
>
> why? kill this beast already.
Two reasons.
1. It turns a mandatory error into a silent f
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:13:30AM -0500, sungo wrote:
> On (02/07 15:53), Rocco Caputo wrote:
>
> > I think the tests should be generated at "make test" time. We get a
> > smaller distribution this way.
>
> you've never been terribly concerned about a really small distribution
> before. we've s
Im working on a module that utilizes POE::Component::Server::TCP. Being
the neat freak that i am, im inclined to name the module
POE::Component::Server::TCP::MUD, though it seems rather cumbersome.
I've seen other modules (such as IRC::Bot) that take the last module and
use it as the begining o
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:03:38AM -0500, sungo wrote:
> On (02/20 14:01), Rocco Caputo wrote:
>
> > Here's a summary of what we've discussed so far. Keep in mind that
> > Scott's original goal was to make wheels faster, not to make call()
> > syntactically sweeter.
>
> let's keep in mind that t
