I now have a new problem (don't I always ;-).
ReadLine has a modification that I didn't spot earlier (due to our
inability to use the last few releases) that doesn't make sense to me.
The change labelled r2098 (which went into 0.37, I believe) does this:
2006-09-05 01:41:11 (r2098) by
Rocco == Rocco Caputo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rocco + The sig() reference count has been removed. There will be much
rejoicing,
Rocco and probably some gnashing of teeth.
I've not been following. Is this an even-numbered week or an odd numbered
week? As in, if a session is waiting for a
Hey, Nick. Discontent is the father of invention.
Revision 2098 works around test failures when POE::Wheel::ReadLine's
DESTROY calls $poe_kernel-select() and state() outside the proper
session context. Certain asserts turn this behavior into hard, fatal
errors, and POE's tests usually
Hi everyone!
While doing some Pod::Coverage stuff for Rocco, I noticed some methods
should be deprecated soon. Rocco wanted to know if anybody else is using
them before we go ahead with the deprecation. I scoured CPAN as much as
possible and didn't find any modules using those methods.
you can also use refcount_increment() - which is more work, but at least you
get to decide whether watching for a signal keeps you alive
On 19 Sep 2006 08:18:59 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com
wrote:
Rocco == Rocco Caputo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rocco + The sig() reference
