>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:29:03 +
>> Subject: Re: POE 1.299 failed test 'transpose' wheel_readline.pm on solaris
>> 10
>> From: hinrik@gmail.com
>> To: cobucci_ch...@hotmail.com
>> CC: p...@0ne.us; po
chris cobucci wrote:
> dear poe geni:
> I hope I am sending to the right list. Can you give
> some direction here? (yes, I turn around for a second and there is a
> later version!)
>
> LIFE IS GOOD:
> IO-Tty 1.07 (not sure if relevant)
>
> IO 1.2301 (not sure if relevant)
> sol10->sparc
ntext, I use POE in a single process;
> finally, the third context is mod_perl2 not using POE -
> database access patterns should be the same for all three,
> as I tend to be generically lazy :-).
>
> Best regards,
> Markus
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: p.
Hello,
I am the author of SimpleDBI and EasyDBI was forked from it to add
it's own features. I would recommend either one of them, but I need to
further understand what server framework you are using. If you're
already preforking, then why not use DBIC or any other DBI module? Are
you using PO
Hello,
Ah, Let me fix a few bugs/typos in your code then it'll work as
intended!
1. You do not need to run waitpid() yourself, POE::Kernel does it
for you :) To be precise, the sig_child event is delivered *after*
POE::Kernel has run waitpid. Maybe the
docs need to be updated to ma
hat Rocco is trying to
simplify with "Reflex" - you should check out his great work on it!
~Apocalypse
Mike Schilli wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, p...@0ne.us wrote:
This is a problem that we've thought of and solved. See the
"Concurrency" option to PoCo::Server::TCP
Hello,
This is a problem that we've thought of and solved. See the
"Concurrency" option to PoCo::Server::TCP
http://search.cpan.org/~rcaputo/POE-1.289/lib/POE/Component/Server/TCP.pm#Concurrency
You must have missed that part or the docs wasn't clear. If you have
suggestions on ho
Hello all,
Thanks to the hard work of Dariusz Jackowski ( ASCENT ) we've
managed to get SSLify to work in nonblocking mode. This is great news,
as your POE apps that use SSLify is now more efficient.
However, it's been tested a little (
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/03/the-work
Winfried Neessen wrote:
Hi,
I've written a server application using POE which is working pretty well
now. It's preforking some
processes and then listens on a TCP port to acceppt client request.
Now I'd like to run it independently, so my question is, is there an
easy way for me to run
Ryan Chan wrote:
Hi ALL,
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:22 AM, p...@0ne.us wrote:
profiling. Also, there are numerous Loop adapters ( POE::Loop::IO_Poll,
POE::XS::Loop::EPoll, etc ) that could take advantage of your platform or
workload to reduce the overhead. As always, benchmark/test your
Tsz Ming WONG wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:22 AM, p...@0ne.us wrote:
Without knowing what kind of profiling you are doing ( Devel::DProf?
NYTProf? )
Are you able to profile POE's code using Devel::DProf without a segfault?
Yeah, trying to profile POE with p
Ryan Chan wrote:
I am profiling my POE program which fetch HTML pages from remote site.
The result show that 80% of time are spent on this file "POE/Loop/Select.pm"
Is it normal and expected behavior?
Hello,
Without knowing what kind of profiling you are doing ( Devel::DProf?
NYTProf?
12 matches
Mail list logo
