Re: Plans etc (was Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release )

2004-08-05 Thread Avik Sengupta
Interesting analysis, for sure. However, I'm not sure its as easy as it sounds. Essentially, the way in which the underlying records are being stored has changed (from create at startup to create and/or spoof on demand) Which is quite cool, but breaks many higher level functionality that depend on

Re: Plans etc (was Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release )

2004-08-05 Thread Rainer Klute
Am Do, den 05.08.2004 schrieb Danny Mui um 1:17: The perf branch should still be a target to convert to, but I agree that things are stagnating and drifting too far apart. It seems we have consensus on these items: 1. From the HEAD fork a new performance branch, say, HSSF_PERF, containing the

RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release

2004-08-05 Thread Height, Jason
No problems ;-) Jason -Original Message- From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 1:11 PM To: POI Developers List Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release Alright but you're going to have to buy me a beer when I'm next in