--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will break existing code. Very Bad Thing! Also,
with my Alan Cooper fanboy
hat on, I think recommending to /prefer/ calling
setCellType() is in itself a Bad Thing.
It wouldnt break existing code since existing code
would be throwing CastClassException
hy everybody, it's me again ... the one asking stupid questions :)
first i wanted to ask whats going on about the xml model definition files ...
are they mandatory? do i have to create such one first? (are all record
classes generated by such definitions?)
a second question i have to throw
Quoting Amol Deshmukh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will break existing code. Very Bad Thing! Also,
with my Alan Cooper fanboy
hat on, I think recommending to /prefer/ calling
setCellType() is in itself a Bad Thing.
It wouldnt break existing code since existing
Can you put in the changes to the record and the aggregate ? I think your mail
brings out an important point... Of how to provide high level access to
formulas. Something i've put some thought to recently... But its the subject of
another mail, and much debate.
Sorry he you received an empty
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35290.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
No, but unit tests ARE more or less mandatory (well only if you want us
to commit it).
Describe what documentation they are undocumented in? The Excel 97
Developer's kit is the general definitive place were something is either
documented or undocumented in. U/f I'm not at home near my copy
