Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-18 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
: [VOTE] New development build +1 to do a dev and prod release... Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2 release .. but please do what you prefer. I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build. Following our

Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-17 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build followed by a prod build? Yes. I assume it would be best to do a dev release first since it's a pretty big change. If you'd rather go straight to 2.5 that's okay with me. The 2.0 series

Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-17 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
From: Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: POI Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:16:43 +1100 To: POI Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] New development build At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: I'm not following you? You mean

Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-17 Thread Danny Mui
+1 2.1 dev (if necessary) 2.5 prod 3.0 Super duper no memory use, instant spreadsheet version... Glen Stampoultzis wrote: I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build. Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the development

Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-17 Thread avik . sengupta
+1 to do a dev and prod release... Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2 release .. but please do what you prefer. I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build. Following our current quirky version

[VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build. Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.

RE: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Height, Jason
2.5 production +1 Jason -Original Message- From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build Precedence: bulk I'd like to do a new development build followed soon

Re: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Ryan Ackley
+1 - Original Message - From: Height, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'POI Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:55 PM Subject: RE: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build 2.5 production +1 Jason -Original Message- From: Glen Stampoultzis

RE: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
[SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build I wasn't spamming... honest! At 01:55 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: 2.5 production +1 Jason Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/

RE: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Height, Jason
Sorry! Stupid filter here at work. You will have to ignore these lines from me im afraid. Jason -Original Message- From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 2:29 PM To: POI Developers List Subject: RE: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build

Re: [VOTE] New development build

2004-02-16 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
in the above email. From: Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: POI Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:32:16 +1100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] New development build I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build