On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Avik Sengupta wrote:
Well my opinion is, 'cant we just get on with it, forget all these
organisational stuff' ... but I suppose that's quite naive.
Yeah. It's now quite some time since we voted on Yegor as a committer, but
he still doesn't have accounts etc as the vote
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Nick Burch wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Nick Burch wrote:
What does everyone else think?
Anyone? I think the main thing is:
do we think committers should be allowed to vote on new releases and new
committers?
At the moment, committers aren't also PMC members, so we
Well my opinion is, 'cant we just get on with it, forget all these
organisational stuff' ... but I suppose that's quite naive.
I dont think there's any question that committers should have votes on
new releases and new committers. In the jakarta scheme of things, that
probably does mean
On 7/13/06, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Nick Burch wrote:
What does everyone else think?
Anyone? I think the main thing is:
do we think committers should be allowed to vote on new releases and new
committers?
At the moment, committers aren't also PMC
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 27.06.2006, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Henri Yandell:
The recent committer and release vote are another example that the 'we
want to be a separate sub-community' doesn't work with the way an
Apache TLP is nowadays. Neither vote (until
Am Dienstag, den 27.06.2006, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Henri Yandell:
The recent committer and release vote are another example that the 'we
want to be a separate sub-community' doesn't work with the way an
Apache TLP is nowadays. Neither vote (until recently) had even one PMC
member voting on it.
