Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-30 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: But from what I see in your subversion, you still need to replace issueTrackingUrl with issueManagement. Done I also went through your ant build and have seen that you do not modify the

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-26 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: But from what I see in your subversion, you still need to replace issueTrackingUrl with issueManagement. Done I also went through your ant build and have seen that you do not modify the root tag metadata. The also needs to be changed to project,

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-25 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: issueManagement systembugzilla/system urlhttp://issues.apache.org/bugzilla//url /issueManagement Thanks, I've updated that BTW: I assume that we are just talking about maven2 here and NOT about maven1. Since that seems to be the version

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-25 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: issueManagement systembugzilla/system urlhttp://issues.apache.org/bugzilla//url /issueManagement Thanks, I've updated that okay. But from what I see in your subversion, you still

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-25 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
No you clarified that Maven is an even more convoluted clusterfsck than I remembered. Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: issueManagement systembugzilla/system

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-24 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, So bug #39977 is not an issue anymore? The groupId bit isn't. Now we understand what it should be, we can use the java package, and all will be fine. Comment #2 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39977#c2) still needs

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-20 Thread Nick Burch
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: So bug #39977 is not an issue anymore? The groupId bit isn't. Now we understand what it should be, we can use the java package, and all will be fine. Comment #2 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39977#c2) still needs looking at,

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-19 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, Are you planning to put the 3.0 release into the maven repository as soon as it is out? As part of the release process, I'll copy them onto people.apache.org, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#repository-guide

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-18 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: Are you planning to put the 3.0 release into the maven repository as soon as it is out? As part of the release process, I'll copy them onto people.apache.org, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#repository-guide . Apparently

3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-17 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
to put the 3.0 release into the maven repository as soon as it is out? I would be very pleased if this could happen quickly. If I can help anyhow on this task, just let me know. Is there something to discuss, that could be done now rather than after the release has been pulled out? E.g. if the goupId

Re: 3.0 release (and maven)

2007-04-17 Thread David Fisher
incompatibility of HSSF (was it UnicodeString instead of String as return-type? cant remember) but that does not matter for me. The WordExtractor is also very useful and will allow me to kick out tm-extractors. Are you planning to put the 3.0 release into the maven repository as soon