Re: [policyd-users] Redundant MySQL connection

2007-10-09 Thread Nate
At 12:00 PM 10/9/2007, Olivier Smedts wrote: >I agree to the idee that replication should not happen in policyd, but >in MySQL, cause MySQL already supports replication and redundancy. And >it works nearly like a charm. But here is the problem : >policyd doesn't use an AUTO_INCREMENT id in its prim

Re: [policyd-users] Redundant MySQL connection

2007-10-09 Thread Olivier Smedts
From: Xavier Beaudouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2007-08-06 14:31 > > The approach that should be taken is: > > > > 1) Set up master -> slave replication > > 2) Change policyd so that all READS happen from the slave(s) > > and WRITES only go to the master. I agree to the idee that replication sho

Re: [policyd-users] feature request: p0f integration

2007-10-09 Thread Nate
At 05:20 AM 6/19/2007, Cami Sardinha wrote: >The correct place to do this is inside of Policyd. > >P0f needs to be running on your MX machines and it >builds a "list" of ip addresses + os. When a request >from Postfix -> Policyd arrives, Policyd will query >the p0f cache (via pipe/socket) and then