Lets hope Robert accepts the patch :)
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Gary V wrote:
> Justin wrote:
>
> > Yet another way to combat spam, very impressive!
>
> > Justin.
>
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Hi, I whipped up a patch for policyd-weight-devel.
> >>
> >> It adds p0f scoring support and greylisting (to be exact, user defined
> >> postfix action) by some rules.
> >>
> >> There are some little details missing, p0f scoring does not affect other
> >> scores (maybe it would help) and greylisting decisions are not cached. I'm
> >> a
> >> bit too busy to check it more, so I leave it up to Robert if he wants..
> >>
> >> URL: http://hege.li/policyd-weight/greylist-p0f.diff
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Henrik
> >>
>
> So far I'm lovin' it.
>
> Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/policydweight[3736]: weighted check:
> NOT_IN_ZEN_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5
> NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_NE_HELO=1.5
>RESOLVED_IP_IS_NOT_HELO=1.5 (check from:
> .itripipod. - helo: .localhost. - helo-domain: .localhost.)
> FROM_NOT_FAILED_HELO(DOMAIN)=3 P0F_WINXP=2
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rate: 3.5
>
> Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/policydweight[3736]: decided
> action=check_greylist
>
> Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/smtpd[3733]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> ALyon-254-1-38-153.w86-193.abo.wanadoo.fr[86.193.177.153]: 450
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected:
>Greylisted, see http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/help/example.com.html;
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> proto=SMTP helo=
>
> ~
> Jan 4 12:27:20 mail postfix/policydweight[3617]: weighted check:
> NOT_IN_ZEN_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 IN_BL_NJABL=4.25
> CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1 P0F_LINUX=-1
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rate: -2.85
>
> Jan 4 12:27:20 mail postfix/policydweight[3617]: decided
> action=check_greylist
>
> Gary V
>
>
> Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
>
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
